|
|
Post by rangerous on Mar 24, 2015 5:47:34 GMT -5
i read this comparison between milliner and wilson in the paper the other day. it went something like this. wilson played for 5 seasons, milliner has been a jet for 2. wilson had 19 passes defended and milliner 16. wilson had 4 ints and milliner 6 and wilson has 147 tackles and milliner in the 40's. again i can't remember the actual numbers but when i looked at them, milliner either looks to be very good or wilson was plenty sucky. here's to hoping milliner can come back strong. a backfield of milliner, revis, and cromartie will be awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Mar 24, 2015 9:10:19 GMT -5
Milliner is a good cornerback, his problem has been and seem that it will continue to be having the opportunity to show it. Since he's always rehabbing
|
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Mar 24, 2015 9:50:47 GMT -5
Are you really questioning whether Wilson was "plenty sucky"?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirtstar on Mar 24, 2015 10:16:58 GMT -5
Cro's deal is essentially a one-year contract. seems pretty clear to me that Milliner is part of the long term plan at the position.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Mar 24, 2015 10:27:11 GMT -5
Cro's deal is essentially a one-year contract. seems pretty clear to me that Milliner is part of the long term plan at the position. I have to agree. If he's not, then we have to draft CB's anyway, this year or next. I just saw an article that said "since Milliner is on the trading block" the Colts should think about him because other than Vontae Davies, they are needy at CB and they "could probably pick him up for a third round pick". OK rumors were floated but this writer was ridiculously certain that Milliner was "on the block". Why would Mac sell this low? He'd have to be stupid. He'd need a first round pick to replace him. |
|
|
|
Post by Dirtstar on Mar 24, 2015 10:58:01 GMT -5
Cro's deal is essentially a one-year contract. seems pretty clear to me that Milliner is part of the long term plan at the position. I have to agree. If he's not, then we have to draft CB's anyway, this year or next. I just saw an article that said "since Milliner is on the trading block" the Colts should think about him because other than Vontae Davies, they are needy at CB and they "could probably pick him up for a third round pick". OK rumors were floated but this writer was ridiculously certain that Milliner was "on the block". Why would Mac sell this low? He'd have to be stupid. He'd need a first round pick to replace him. all that noise started as a result of a Manish article. 'nuff said. let Milliner get healthy this year, no need to rush him back. same thing for McDougle. let them learn from the best. |
|
|
|
Post by jetstream23 on Mar 24, 2015 11:00:31 GMT -5
No reason to trade Milliner now. None. He's still under contract for 2 more years. This will be rehab year and if he shows health and capability then 2016 is when we'd expect him to show what he can do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Mar 25, 2015 12:29:07 GMT -5
Cro's deal is essentially a one-year contract. seems pretty clear to me that Milliner is part of the long term plan at the position. I have to agree. If he's not, then we have to draft CB's anyway, this year or next. I just saw an article that said "since Milliner is on the trading block" the Colts should think about him because other than Vontae Davies, they are needy at CB and they "could probably pick him up for a third round pick". OK rumors were floated but this writer was ridiculously certain that Milliner was "on the block". Why would Mac sell this low? He'd have to be stupid. He'd need a first round pick to replace him. And considering he was the 7th overall pick even the Colts 1st would be a step down and a loss. If he comes back, stays healthy and is just decent he'd be worth more than a 3rd. |
|
