|
Post by adpz on Mar 25, 2015 17:52:31 GMT -5
If ya cant beat 'em...CHANGE THE RULES. . If you can't beat 'em...DON'T PLAY BY THE RULES Bwahahahahahahhah ~ Robert Kraft
|
|
|
Post by jetstream23 on Mar 25, 2015 17:53:53 GMT -5
Notice how new rules always seem to be reactionary towards something questionable the Flats* have done? How do you write a rule like this? INeligible receivers are really ineligible? but Flats* and Flats* fans alike believe their "superbowl" is legitimate. And what about deflated balls? There's already a rule against that, and it's getting swept under the rug as we speakĀ I am completely outraged! First, a fumble was not a fumble because of the Tuck rule. Now, the ball that was being tucked all those years turns out to have been deflated, and being thrown to ineligible receivers! In the interim, the teams who were trying to defend the deflated, tucked balls from being thrown to ineligible receivers were being videotaped! Seriously, where does it stop?!?!? Is it too much to ask that Roger Goodell checks to make sure that Kraft's balls aren't deflated?....and that the person playing with his balls is eligible to do so?
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Mar 25, 2015 17:57:51 GMT -5
If was cheating there would have been a rule against it. That there needs to be a rule against it is proof it is cheating in the first place. Rule-breakers beget 'not' rules. It's why the penal code isn't filled with 'DO let strangers live" but rather 'DON'T kill people you don't know'. Serial offenders like Aaron Hern... I mean - the Pats - are why these stupid 'not' rules continue to evolve and clog up the rule-book.
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Mar 25, 2015 17:59:13 GMT -5
Notice how new rules always seem to be reactionary towards something questionable the Flats* have done? How do you write a rule like this? INeligible receivers are really ineligible? but Flats* and Flats* fans alike believe their "superbowl" is legitimate. And what about deflated balls? There's already a rule against that, and it's getting swept under the rug as we speak I am completely outraged! First, a fumble was not a fumble because of the Tuck rule. Now, the ball that was being tucked all those years turns out to have been deflated, and being thrown to ineligible receivers! In the interim, the teams who were trying to defend the deflated, tucked balls from being thrown to ineligible receivers were being videotaped! Seriously, where does it stop?!?!? Is it too much to ask that Roger Goodell checks to make sure that Kraft's balls aren't deflated?....and that the person playing with his balls is eligible to do so?
|
|
|
Post by JetBidi on Mar 25, 2015 18:14:33 GMT -5
Notice how new rules always seem to be reactionary towards something questionable the Flats* have done? How do you write a rule like this? INeligible receivers are really ineligible? but Flats* and Flats* fans alike believe their "superbowl" is legitimate. And what about deflated balls? There's already a rule against that, and it's getting swept under the rug as we speak I am completely outraged! First, a fumble was not a fumble because of the Tuck rule. Now, the ball that was being tucked all those years turns out to have been deflated, and being thrown to ineligible receivers! In the interim, the teams who were trying to defend the deflated, tucked balls from being thrown to ineligible receivers were being videotaped! Seriously, where does it stop?!?!? Is it too much to ask that Roger Goodell checks to make sure that Kraft's balls aren't deflated?....and that the person playing with his balls is eligible to do so?Kraft: Hell yeah those balls were deflated, but let's keep that between me and you buddy. Goodsell: LOL. Sure thing Mr. Kraft sir.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 25, 2015 18:14:45 GMT -5
we're used to this.
If the NEPs win again next year the rest of the league will try and outlaw the forward pass.
Also you know BB already is working on something creative for next year. Chess vs. checkers, rubes.....chess.....vs.......checkers,
|
|
|
Post by JetBidi on Mar 25, 2015 18:16:44 GMT -5
we're used to this. You know BB already is working on cheating again next year. Chess vs. checkers, rubes.....chess.....vs.......checkers, Fixed
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Mar 25, 2015 18:26:50 GMT -5
obviously the Flats*ies were right to take advantage of the rule and the ravens were stupid to not understand what was coming. This guy gets it. Why not design plays within the rules? Ohhhhh deception...trickery!!!!! Except your ball deflaters didn't even know the rules as they were declaring ineligible receivers as eligible receivers. Those were plays designed outside the rules.
|
|
|
Post by rangerous on Mar 25, 2015 18:41:45 GMT -5
If ya cant beat 'em...CHANGE THE RULES. . just like when kraft had the rules changed in 07 to protect brady.
|
|
|
Post by wesleymctoon on Mar 25, 2015 19:54:23 GMT -5
we're used to this. If the NEPs win again next year the rest of the league will try and outlaw the forward pass. Also you know BB already is working on something creative for next year. Chess vs. checkers, rubes.....chess.....vs.......checkers, Delusional. As always.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 25, 2015 20:21:15 GMT -5
I don't expect you guys to understand, your team never wins anything.
You'll seem someday (maybe).
Once you become a winner, everyone guns for you.
I experience it in my personal life as well.
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Mar 25, 2015 20:37:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by southside on Mar 25, 2015 20:54:06 GMT -5
Can we stop respecting him now?
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Mar 25, 2015 21:12:56 GMT -5
I don't expect you guys to understand, your team never wins anything. You'll seem someday (maybe). Once you become a winner, everyone guns for you. I experience it in my personal life as well. you were too chicken to play Mock Draft. Shows how much you know about football STFU
|
|
|
Post by PK on Mar 25, 2015 21:20:48 GMT -5
Notice how new rules always seem to be reactionary towards something questionable the Flats* have done? How do you write a rule like this? INeligible receivers are really ineligible? but Flats* and Flats* fans alike believe their "superbowl" is legitimate. And what about deflated balls? There's already a rule against that, and it's getting swept under the rug as we speakĀ Exactly. Rule states balls must be inflated to certain psi. Team provides own balls. Balls team provides are under inflated. Rule broken. End of story. No need to investigate.
|
|