|
|
Post by CTJetsFanII on May 1, 2015 7:58:10 GMT -5
Seems like people are assuming that Mo will be the odd man out at some point (maybe not this year).
Why wouldn't Coples be the one we choose not to keep? We did pick up his option for this year, but he's yet to live up to his draft position. Yes, some of that is Rex's fault for jerking him around, but maybe 2015 is the last year for Coples and we use his money for Mo and we go forward with Mo, Sheldon & Williams.
|
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on May 1, 2015 8:07:09 GMT -5
Money and trade value.
|
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on May 1, 2015 8:16:06 GMT -5
Seems like people are assuming that Mo will be the odd man out at some point (maybe not this year). Why wouldn't Coples be the one we choose not to keep? We did pick up his option for this year, but he's yet to live up to his draft position. Yes, some of that is Rex's fault for jerking him around, but maybe 2015 is the last year for Coples and we use his money for Mo and we go forward with Mo, Sheldon & Williams. Was just thinking Snacks could be the odd man out next year as well - he's only on a one year deal |
|
|
|
Post by CTJetsFanII on May 1, 2015 8:20:30 GMT -5
Seems like people are assuming that Mo will be the odd man out at some point (maybe not this year). Why wouldn't Coples be the one we choose not to keep? We did pick up his option for this year, but he's yet to live up to his draft position. Yes, some of that is Rex's fault for jerking him around, but maybe 2015 is the last year for Coples and we use his money for Mo and we go forward with Mo, Sheldon & Williams. Was just thinking Snacks could be the odd man out next year as well - he's only on a one year deal Definitely possible but I think he has a more unique skill set and that is the size to 2 gap on the nose if we want him to. Coples' skill set isn't much different than Mo, Sheldon & Williams. I still maintain that asking him to drop into coverage is a waste and something he'll never be very good at. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 8:22:56 GMT -5
This ain't Club Rex.
|
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on May 1, 2015 8:26:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on May 1, 2015 12:38:40 GMT -5
If true it's going to take a gross over payment for someone to pry Wilkerson from us.
|
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on May 1, 2015 12:44:57 GMT -5
If true it's going to take a gross over payment for someone to pry Wilkerson from us. I mean at this point with the first round over I highly doubt we trade him for only future picks...it would have to be the Raiders giving us Cooper and next year's first or something huge along those lines. |
|
|
|
Post by nyjets1969 on May 1, 2015 14:06:19 GMT -5
Jets will use him this season franchise tag him and move him in 2016 for picks. The reason the Jets can't keep him is the salary cap. With 70 million tied up in Revis, 32 million in cro. With Sheldon Richardson approaching the end of his contract. The Jets just can't afford to sign everyone so Mo will be the odd guy out. Not this year no rush to move him until 2016 they will groom williams and next year move MO.
|
|
|
|
Post by sadface on May 1, 2015 14:09:08 GMT -5
hypothetical: Bucs offer 2015 2nd and 2016 1st for Wilkerson. do you take it?
|
|
|
|
Post by CTJetsFanII on May 1, 2015 14:18:46 GMT -5
hypothetical: Bucs offer 2015 2nd and 2016 1st for Wilkerson. do you take it? I would strongly consider it. |
|
|
|
Post by Brady's a catcher on May 1, 2015 14:58:36 GMT -5
hypothetical: Bucs offer 2015 2nd and 2016 1st for Wilkerson. do you take it? I would strongly consider it. would do that deal for sure, great chance the 2016 pick is top 10. |
|
|
|
Post by rangerous on May 1, 2015 16:46:54 GMT -5
hypothetical: Bucs offer 2015 2nd and 2016 1st for Wilkerson. do you take it? I would strongly consider it. i think i'd take it. first off the draft chart value is way higher than wilk's first round pick level. second, tampa is probably not going be that good in 2016 in spite of winston and their 2nd choice this season is nearly as good as a first rounder. |
|
