|
Post by johnnyhector on Mar 8, 2017 12:21:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Mar 8, 2017 12:27:31 GMT -5
Holy shit. I didn't even realize Pierre Garçon was still in the league.
Isn't he like 43?
$16 MILLION?!?
_
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 8, 2017 12:31:59 GMT -5
Holy shit. I didn't even realize Pierre Garçon was still in the league. Isn't he like 43? $16 MILLION?!? _ He is 31. Probably front loading his deal as much as they can since the Niners have over $98MM in cap space. Which I believe would be the most any team has ever had if the Browns weren't over $100MM this season.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Mar 8, 2017 12:35:08 GMT -5
Holy shit. I didn't even realize Pierre Garçon was still in the league. Isn't he like 43? $16 MILLION?!? _ He is 31. Probably front loading his deal as much as they can since the Niners have over $98MM in cap space. Which I believe would be the most any team has ever had if the Browns weren't over $100MM this season. Wasn't he on the Colts when Unitas was the QB? _
|
|
|
Post by johnnyhector on Mar 8, 2017 13:10:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 8, 2017 13:53:25 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 14:28:43 GMT -5
Tony Romo will soon no longer be a Dallas Cowboy. The Cowboys will release the franchise's all-time leader in passing yards and touchdowns on Thursday, sources told ESPN, allowing him the chance to sign with another team if he desires while removing any doubt that they have the utmost faith in Dak Prescott. It is unclear whether the Cowboys will make Romo a June 1 designation, which would save the Cowboys $14 million against the cap this year, but Romo would still count $10.7 million on the 2017 cap and $8.9 million on the 2018 cap. If they release him without the designation, the Cowboys will save $5.1 million against the salary cap but will carry $19.6 million in dead money for 2017. www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18854803/dallas-cowboys-release-tony-romo-thursday
|
|
|
Post by johnnyhector on Mar 8, 2017 14:34:15 GMT -5
|
|
gman
Full Member
1%
Posts: 377
|
Post by gman on Mar 8, 2017 15:03:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by willis on Mar 8, 2017 15:15:29 GMT -5
If he manages to give them one season like we got in 2015, then it is a good signing, however, if last year is more likely what to expect out of him, good luck to the Giants. This is just another reason to root against the Giants. If they are losin and miss the playoffs, it's a guarantee Mr football player/media guy starts fightin with OBJ. Got a bad feeling about this one ... the guy could be going to his first playoff game ... they get some help on the O line, and have a decent running game ... and there are rumors of Mangold going there also ... they may put together a team that goes deep into the playoffs. And where does that leave us? Probably hollering for Maccagnan and Bowles to be deleted. Hope I'm wrong ... but it looks like the Giants are preparing for a playoff run again, and it looks like the Jets are planning on a shipwrecked season.
|
|
|
Post by willis on Mar 8, 2017 15:20:37 GMT -5
This is just another reason to root against the Giants. If they are losin and miss the playoffs, it's a guarantee Mr football player/media guy starts fightin with OBJ. Got a bad feeling about this one ... the guy could be going to his first playoff game ... they get some help on the O line, and have a decent running game ... and there are rumors of Mangold going there also ... they may put together a team that goes deep into the playoffs. and where does that leave us? Probably hollering for Maccagnan and Bowles to be deleted. Hope I'm wrong ... but it looks like the Giants are preparing for a playoff run again, and it looks like the Jets are planning on a shipwrecked season. If they do pick up Mangold ... and they do go deep into the playoffs ... with Marshall and Snacks ... with the three of them making significant contributions, then Bowles and Maccagnan have to be credited with helping the Giants do it ... which will fit these two guys in nicely with previous Kotite-like and Gutman-like Jets management teams.
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Mar 8, 2017 15:37:22 GMT -5
Dammit
Bills signed Patrick DiMarco
Jets need to make a run at one of these FB's if they're serious about getting back to pounding the ball.
Juszczyk and Tolbert are still out there.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyhector on Mar 8, 2017 16:55:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by johnnyhector on Mar 8, 2017 17:07:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Stark on Mar 8, 2017 17:11:02 GMT -5
Dammit Bills signed Patrick DiMarco Jets need to make a run at one of these FB's if they're serious about getting back to pounding the ball. Juszczyk and Tolbert are still out there. Kyle Juszczyk - RB - 49ers 49ers agreed to terms with FB Kyle Juszczyk, formerly of the Ravens. Juszczyk is an excellent blocker, but also an adept pass catcher, snagging 78 passes over the past two seasons. He'll be a versatile body out of the backfield for creative play-caller Kyle Shanahan. Slowly but surely, the 49ers are at least adding a few viable NFLers to their skill corps. Juszczyk turns 26 in April. Related: Ravens Source: Adam Schefter on Twitter Mar 8 - 4:48 PM Mike Tolbert - RB - Bills Bills agreed to terms with FB Mike Tolbert, formerly of the Panthers. It makes little sense on a day where the Bills have already signed Patrick DiMarco, but ESPN's Jordan Raanan reports Tolbert is coming aboard as a running back. Whatever his position is listed as, it's a puzzling move. The Bills must view Tolbert as a battering ram behind LeSean McCoy, who has had struggles at the goal line. Tolbert played for new coach Sean McDermott in Carolina. Source: Jordan Raanan on Twitter Mar 8 - 4:40 PM
|
|