|
|
Post by jetstream23 on Apr 29, 2017 17:24:23 GMT -5
Free agency over. Draft over. What does the 53 look like in September?
|
|
|
|
Post by stlouiejetfan on Apr 29, 2017 18:56:27 GMT -5
QB
1 Hack
2 McCown
3 Petty
|
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Apr 29, 2017 19:06:55 GMT -5
We want to win?
QB Bryce Petty.
We want to tank?
QB Christian Hackenberg.
We have a fucktard moron coach?
QB Josh McCown.
_
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Apr 29, 2017 19:09:54 GMT -5
We want to win? QB Bryce Petty. We want to tank? QB Christian Hackenberg. We have a fucktard moron coach? QB Josh McCown. _ It will be McCown. |
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Apr 29, 2017 19:10:46 GMT -5
We want to win? QB Bryce Petty. We want to tank? QB Christian Hackenberg. We have a fucktard moron coach? QB Josh McCown. _ It will be McCown. It. Cannot. Be. It just can't. _ |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Apr 29, 2017 19:16:51 GMT -5
It. Cannot. Be. It just can't. _ I can hear it now. He gives us the best chance to win.....the same guy that has won 2 of his last 22 starts. |
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Apr 29, 2017 19:21:14 GMT -5
We want to win? QB Bryce Petty. We want to tank? QB Christian Hackenberg. We have a fucktard moron coach? QB Josh McCown. _ It will be McCown. Maybe for the first 4-6 weeks And after we're 1-5/0-6 I expect Hack to be given at least 8 games to show what he can do. |
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Apr 29, 2017 19:22:31 GMT -5
Maybe for the first 4-6 weeks And after we're 1-5/0-6 I expect Hack to be given at least 8 games to show what he can do. It cannot fucking be. It must be Hack or Petty. No other logical choice. _ |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Apr 29, 2017 19:23:29 GMT -5
Maybe for the first 4-6 weeks And after we're 1-5/0-6 I expect Hack to be given at least 8 games to show what he can do. It didn't happen this year as we kept trotting out Fitz after we were completely eliminated. What makes you think next year will be different? |
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Apr 29, 2017 19:28:44 GMT -5
Maybe for the first 4-6 weeks And after we're 1-5/0-6 I expect Hack to be given at least 8 games to show what he can do. It didn't happen this year as we kept trotting out Fitz after we were completely eliminated. What makes you think next year will be different? Because they have to get a look at Hackenberg this year. It's undeniable. They essentially spent a Top 50 pick on him (#51) and just gave him a redshirt season. He's had a full calendar year to step back, regain some confidence, work on his mechanics, watch a 16 game season from the sidelines, digest an NFL playbook, etc. As soon as they signed a 15 year journeyman in McCown I would've phoned Hack and told him it's his job to lose. Maybe Hack is still a little too green to start against the Bills Week 1, but there's no doubt in my mind that he's behind center well before Halloween. Either due to injury to McCown or McCown's own shitty play. Flip a coin. |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Apr 29, 2017 19:42:41 GMT -5
It didn't happen this year as we kept trotting out Fitz after we were completely eliminated. What makes you think next year will be different? Because they have to get a look at Hackenberg this year. It's undeniable. They essentially spent a Top 50 pick on him (#51) and just gave him a redshirt season. He's had a full calendar year to step back, regain some confidence, work on his mechanics, watch a 16 game season from the sidelines, digest an NFL playbook, etc. As soon as they signed a 15 year journeyman in McCown I would've phoned Hack and told him it's his job to lose. Maybe Hack is still a little too green to start against the Bills Week 1, but there's no doubt in my mind that he's behind center well before Halloween. Either due to injury to McCown or McCown's own shitty play. Flip a coin. It was no different last year with Petty because we needed to find out what we had. He was hurt early but he had plenty of opportunities to take over for Fitz down the stretch and rode the pine because Fitz gave us the best chance to win. I doubt they ever end up playing Hack unless both Petty and McCown get hurt, which is a real possibility. |
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Apr 29, 2017 19:43:40 GMT -5
Maybe for the first 4-6 weeks And after we're 1-5/0-6 I expect Hack to be given at least 8 games to show what he can do. It cannot fucking be. It must be Hack or Petty. No other logical choice. _ This is Jets football. There is no logic. |
|
|
|
Post by Gunnails on Apr 29, 2017 19:49:00 GMT -5
What does the 53 look like in September? ======================================================== That's all together to much work for me to consider it at this point, There may come a day I don't consider it work, but for now, sounds like to much work. |
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Apr 29, 2017 19:55:06 GMT -5
Because they have to get a look at Hackenberg this year. It's undeniable. They essentially spent a Top 50 pick on him (#51) and just gave him a redshirt season. He's had a full calendar year to step back, regain some confidence, work on his mechanics, watch a 16 game season from the sidelines, digest an NFL playbook, etc. As soon as they signed a 15 year journeyman in McCown I would've phoned Hack and told him it's his job to lose. Maybe Hack is still a little too green to start against the Bills Week 1, but there's no doubt in my mind that he's behind center well before Halloween. Either due to injury to McCown or McCown's own shitty play. Flip a coin. It was no different last year with Petty because we needed to find out what we had. He was hurt early but he had plenty of opportunities to take over for Fitz down the stretch and rode the pine because Fitz gave us the best chance to win. I doubt they ever end up playing Hack unless both Petty and McCown get hurt, which is a real possibility. I disagree Petty was a 4th round project who never had more than maybe a 10% chance of becoming anything more than a career backup to begin with. You take a QB #51 overall, and you're drafting him with the intentions of him being a starter sooner rather than later. The Jets had their shot at every QB not named Trubisky this year and passed. They'll want to see at least 8 games out of Hack before they start prepping for what is going to potentially be an absolutely stacked QB class. Darnold, Rosen, Allen, Falk...even Lamar Jackson... You could argue that every one of those guys would be ranked ahead of Trubisky/Mahomes/Watson. |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Apr 29, 2017 20:00:53 GMT -5
It was no different last year with Petty because we needed to find out what we had. He was hurt early but he had plenty of opportunities to take over for Fitz down the stretch and rode the pine because Fitz gave us the best chance to win. I doubt they ever end up playing Hack unless both Petty and McCown get hurt, which is a real possibility. I disagree Petty was a 4th round project who never had more than maybe a 10% chance of becoming anything more than a career backup to begin with. You take a QB #51 overall, and you're drafting him with the intentions of him being a starter sooner rather than later. The Jets had their shot at every QB not named Trubisky this year and passed. They'll want to see at least 8 games out of Hack before they start prepping for what is going to potentially be an absolutely stacked QB class. Darnold, Rosen, Allen, Falk...even Lamar Jackson... You could argue that every one of those guys would be ranked ahead of Trubisky/Mahomes/Watson. We'll agree to disagree. I think Hack will be so bad that they'll never insert him as a starter. I hope I'm wrong and he turns into the guy, just don't see it. I do agree about next year though. If Darnold, Falk, Rosen, maybe Allen, and Jackson came out this year Trubisky is a 2nd to 3rd rounder and Mahomes and Watson are going in the 3rd to 4th. |
|
