|
|
Post by Bing© in Buffalo Chairman on Oct 1, 2017 16:13:03 GMT -5
Looks pretty good thus far....
Ya never know.
|
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Oct 1, 2017 16:20:04 GMT -5
Looks pretty good thus far.... Ya never know. McClown = Bubby Brister is more likely. |
|
|
|
Post by JonEJet on Oct 1, 2017 16:23:02 GMT -5
I thought McClown sucked today
|
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Oct 1, 2017 16:24:40 GMT -5
I thought McClown sucked today He did. Gave 10 points to JAX single handedly with his stupid behind the line of scrimmage pass and INT. |
|
|
|
Post by Bing© in Buffalo Chairman on Oct 1, 2017 16:26:44 GMT -5
Looks pretty good thus far.... Ya never know. McClown = Bubby Brister is more likely. Bubbling Blisters |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Oct 1, 2017 16:27:58 GMT -5
McClown = Bubby Brister is more likely. Bubbling Blisters Lol! McClown is gonna do a shovel pass that will be reuturned for a TD by the opposing D this season. I know it. |
|
|
|
Post by Harrier on Oct 1, 2017 17:56:47 GMT -5
I hated Fitz but at least McClown can push the ball 15 yards down field.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2017 18:02:14 GMT -5
He was immaculate; at least compared to you vermin. Good god. The backwards pass was horrible. But otherwise he's got the offense lining up right; he gets the ball out faster as the game goes on...lots of error free football between gaffs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Oct 3, 2017 13:27:57 GMT -5
I hated Fitz but at least McClown can push the ball 15 yards down field. And he's more accurate. Don't get me wrong, they're both below average, but I do think that McCown is better. The only difference is that McCown has only been the starting QB on teams that know they are going to suck, while Fits gets his Witch Doctor to put an injury hex on the starter when he is the back-up on a half-way decent team. From what I've seen, without question I'd take McCown as my second string QB over Fits. |
|
|
|
Post by Harrier on Oct 3, 2017 13:34:39 GMT -5
I hated Fitz but at least McClown can push the ball 15 yards down field. And he's more accurate. Don't get me wrong, they're both below average, but I do think that McCown is better. The only difference is that McCown has only been the starting QB on teams that know they are going to suck, while Fits gets his Witch Doctor to put an injury hex on the starter when he is the back-up on a half-way decent team. From what I've seen, without question I'd take McCown as my second string QB over Fits. Imagine the gush if Marshall was here with Josh. |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Oct 3, 2017 14:14:29 GMT -5
To me the big difference between McCown and Fitz is that Fitz had a gunslinger's mentality with a game manager's arm. At least McCown knows what he is and has not tried to do too much. Makes for some boring offense - lets face it, without the two big runs last week, we just managed a few FGs. But its nice to be the team pulling off the big plays this year -- last season they all seemed to go against us. Or maybe the big plays suck because of the tank and everything. This team confuses me as a fan this year.
As to who is better, I don't know -- does it really matter if you are the 25th best QB in the NFL or 31st. Either way, they are both bottom tier QBs who can give you stretches of competent play. They have both had some good years and some bad. McCown looks like a better fit for a young team since he appears to be likely to take care of the ball better and make better decisions.
Adding Vinny to the equation -- he had the gunslinger's mentality and the gunslinger's arm, but lacked consistency throughout his career. But when he put together his competent stretches, they could be brilliant unlike the other two guys. And in 1998, he was brilliant. McCown is not getting to that level.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harrier on Oct 3, 2017 15:02:33 GMT -5
To me the big difference between McCown and Fitz is that Fitz had a gunslinger's mentality with a game manager's arm. At least McCown knows what he is and has not tried to do too much. Makes for some boring offense - lets face it, without the two big runs last week, we just managed a few FGs. But its nice to be the team pulling off the big plays this year -- last season they all seemed to go against us. Or maybe the big plays suck because of the tank and everything. This team confuses me as a fan this year. As to who is better, I don't know -- does it really matter if you are the 25th best QB in the NFL or 31st. Either way, they are both bottom tier QBs who can give you stretches of competent play. They have both had some good years and some bad. McCown looks like a better fit for a young team since he appears to be likely to take care of the ball better and make better decisions. Adding Vinny to the equation -- he had the gunslinger's mentality and the gunslinger's arm, but lacked consistency throughout his career. But when he put together his competent stretches, they could be brilliant unlike the other two guys. And in 1998, he was brilliant. McCown is not getting to that level. McCown at least keeps a defence honest because he has the arm to hurt you...Fitz made the offence one dimensional, boring and predictable. Hated the man with every fibre of my being. |
|
