Even National Geographic Has Gone SJW

Thats my biggest issue with this... the kid is 9.   That seems way too young to be making decisions about hormone therapy and whatever else is involved here. 

I dont see the moral equivalence.  In my opinion some people deserve to die.  Children are innocent and should never be preyed on.

Intersex” is an umbrella term referring to the roughly 1 in 2,000 people born with variations of sex anatomy that put them somewhere on the long continuum between male and female. Formerly called hermaphrodites, doctors now say they have “disorders of sexual development.” Often these involve “ambiguous” genitalia or genitals that are clearly male or female but still atypical, such as a very small penis or an enlarged clitoris. Only rarely is it medical necessary to perform operations on intersex children, but that has not stopped such procedures from going forward. While available data is incomplete, it appears that they occur at least 1,750 times per year, most commonly between early infancy and two years after the child is born.


It’s understandable that parents would be distressed upon learning that their newborns are intersex. Parents can also be forgiven for grasping at anything to protect their children from what they fear will be lifetimes of trauma. That is where doctors should come in with sound advice, and that is where the system cracks. “Doctors are telling parents that the procedures are necessary and should be done in the first year of life,” said Anne Tamar-Mattis, an intersex rights advocate and attorney. “Parents are telling me that they are being bullied and pressured; they are distressed and vulnerable and are not being given all of the information they need to decide what to do.”..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Thomas Rid is a professor at King’s College London and author of Rise of the Machines (W.W. Norton/Scribe, 2016). He is on Twitter at @ridt.

I think I answered that when I said I dont see the moral equivalence.  Things are very rarely equivalent in real life.  Only when we try to make arguments we put things in such tidy boxes.

If someone told me they were angry and thought about killing someone I would feel differently than if they told me they got horny for a child once.  So I would say thinking about sexually abusing a child is more evil.  

Easy answer, if you are tempted but do not act, you are, in fact, NOT evil. I do believe the actual definition of being a good person includes, among other things, not giving in to temptation i.e. evil thoughts.

How would YOU react if they wanted to study how to "correct" or "change" YOUR sexual behavior?

Gays dont feel they need "fixing".