|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 29, 2016 15:47:46 GMT -5
 Do you have me confused with someone else? Is there another brilliant, good looking, guy name Sonny Werblin on here?  |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Dec 29, 2016 16:15:47 GMT -5
Do you have me confused with someone else? Is there another brilliant, good looking, guy name Sonny Werblin on here? I am not familiar with anyone who meets that description. |
|
|
|
Post by flushingjet on Dec 29, 2016 16:22:48 GMT -5
It's ok to say, but it's meaningless It just means: More Americans voted for Clinton. I say, prove it. Perform an audit of all votes in the USA, At least 800000 Motor Voter capable Drivers licenses were issued by Moonbeam in CA to illegal parasites. Overcounts for Granny Bobblehead were discovered in the MI recount. Surely you certainly won't mind voting next election with your free verified citizenship , residence, and realtime dead\alive status checked Voter ID. What can be more enlightened than fairness and honesty? |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 29, 2016 16:29:06 GMT -5
It just means: More Americans voted for Clinton. I say, prove it. Perform an audit of all votes in the USA, At least 800000 Motor Voter capable Drivers licenses were issued by Moonbeam in CA to illegal parasites. Overcounts for Granny Bobblehead were discovered in the MI recount. Surely you certainly won't mind voting next election with your free verified citizenship , residence, and realtime dead\alive status checked Voter ID. What can be more enlightened than fairness and honesty? Sure, why not? (BTW would you rather illegals not have licenses? I like them proving their identity and where they live. And taking eye tests to show they can see well, and a written test on driving rules as well as a driving test to show they can operate a motor vehicle....but if you just want them to drive illegally...OK I guess.) |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Dec 29, 2016 16:57:32 GMT -5
I don't care how much money Lena Dumham has - I wouldn't switch places with her for a trillion dollars. You see what she looks like? Omg. Part man, part pig - she kinda looks like that blue elephant alien character who played the round piano in the bar scene in Star Wars. Also, she's the unstable, hysterical type that I wouldn't be surprised at all if she took a bottle of sleeping pills, slit her wrists in a bathtub and ended it all tomorrow. I could totally understand too - I wouldn't want to live another minute if I was as hideously disgusting and hated as her. Except she's loved by millions. And we haven't seen your picture. Are you handsome?  She's hated by billions! No one likes her. Her crappy TV show has the worst ratings on cable. They were never good - look it up. I work with a bunch of young girls and they all loathe her. Plus, she's now like 32 and officially an old bag. You think she's gonna get better with age? The only role she could play is an old fat Hillary Clinton in the "Wicked Witch of Westchester: A True Story or Loss and Losing." As for me, of course I'm handsome - on a scale of 1-10, I'm an eleven-teen! |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Dec 29, 2016 17:03:38 GMT -5
It's ok to say, but it's meaningless It just means: More Americans voted for Clinton. Which means....? What? What does one get for having the most overall votes? That's not how you win. That she could get the most overall votes and lose the electoral vote by more than one state coming up 38 electoral votes short is a testament to her status as a Loser. She only won 41.5% of the States. You can't be president if you win barely more than 40% of the states. More importantly, California and New York's 84 electoral votes are a given for any Dem -- That's 31% of the way to 270! How any Democrat can lose the Electoral vote with that advantage is mind blowing! So, I stand corrected. It does have meaning. It means she's a bigger Loser than I had imagined because she found a way to win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote by 74 votes. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 29, 2016 17:08:02 GMT -5
It just means: More Americans voted for Clinton. Which means....? What? What does one get for having the most overall votes? That's not how you win. That she could get the most overall votes and lose the electoral vote by more than one state coming up 38 electoral votes short is a testament to her status as a Loser. She only won 41.5% of the States. You can't be president if you win barely more than 40% of the states. More importantly, California and New York's 84 electoral votes are a given for any Dem -- That's 31% of the way to 270! How any Democrat can lose the Electoral vote with that advantage is mind blowing! So, I stand corrected. It does have meaning. It means she's a bigger Loser than I had imagined because she found a way to win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote by 74 votes. It just means: More Americans voted for Clinton. Sometimes things just mean what they mean. |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Dec 29, 2016 17:09:34 GMT -5
I say, prove it. Perform an audit of all votes in the USA, At least 800000 Motor Voter capable Drivers licenses were issued by Moonbeam in CA to illegal parasites. Overcounts for Granny Bobblehead were discovered in the MI recount. Surely you certainly won't mind voting next election with your free verified citizenship , residence, and realtime dead\alive status checked Voter ID. What can be more enlightened than fairness and honesty? Sure, why not? (BTW would you rather illegals not have licenses? I like them proving their identity and where they live. And taking eye tests to show they can see well, and a written test on driving rules as well as a driving test to show they can operate a motor vehicle....but if you just want them to drive illegally...OK I guess.) yes. I would rather that people in the country illegally not be permitted to have a drivers license. I think it is hilarious that you believe licensing illegals makes the roads safer. So, you honestly believe the illegals that can't pass a driver's test will just decide not to drive? Or that someone is a safer driver simply because they passed a driver's test? They are the same driver regardless of whether they decide to go take the test and get a driver's license. How about this, they can get a driver's license if it has a watermark that says "Illegal Alien", or if those words are harmful, how about "non-citizen resident". And I'll give you your Resident Alien Driver's License rights in exchange for a voter ID law. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 29, 2016 17:12:56 GMT -5
Except she's loved by millions. And we haven't seen your picture. Are you handsome? She's hated by billions! No one likes her. Her crappy TV show has the worst ratings on cable. They were never good - look it up. I work with a bunch of young girls and they all loathe her. Plus, she's now like 32 and officially an old bag. You think she's gonna get better with age? The only role she could play is an old fat Hillary Clinton in the "Wicked Witch of Westchester: A True Story or Loss and Losing." As for me, of course I'm handsome - on a scale of 1-10, I'm an eleven-teen! But how many Twitter followers do you have? |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 29, 2016 17:14:35 GMT -5
Sure, why not? (BTW would you rather illegals not have licenses? I like them proving their identity and where they live. And taking eye tests to show they can see well, and a written test on driving rules as well as a driving test to show they can operate a motor vehicle....but if you just want them to drive illegally...OK I guess.) yes. I would rather that people in the country illegally not be permitted to have a drivers license. I think it is hilarious that you believe licensing illegals makes the roads safer. So, you honestly believe the illegals that can't pass a driver's test will just decide not to drive? Or that someone is a safer driver simply because they passed a driver's test? They are the same driver regardless of whether they decide to go take the test and get a driver's license. So why do we make kids take the tests? They will be the same driver. |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Dec 29, 2016 17:14:51 GMT -5
It just means: More Americans voted for Clinton. Which means....? What? What does one get for having the most overall votes? That's not how you win. That she could get the most overall votes and lose the electoral vote by more than one state coming up 38 electoral votes short is a testament to her status as a Loser. She only won 41.5% of the States. You can't be president if you win barely more than 40% of the states. More importantly, California and New York's 84 electoral votes are a given for any Dem -- That's 31% of the way to 270! How any Democrat can lose the Electoral vote with that advantage is mind blowing! So, I stand corrected. It does have meaning. It means she's a bigger Loser than I had imagined because she found a way to win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote by 74 votes. Sonny - why are you even arguing with him. You can't argue with an idiot. We won , they lost. Ff2 isn't done crying with the other losers who refuse to accept reality. It's so great watching them be miserable. It's like winning all over again. In fact, I found a video of ff2 from the other day: |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 29, 2016 17:15:49 GMT -5
Which means....? What? What does one get for having the most overall votes? That's not how you win. That she could get the most overall votes and lose the electoral vote by more than one state coming up 38 electoral votes short is a testament to her status as a Loser. She only won 41.5% of the States. You can't be president if you win barely more than 40% of the states. More importantly, California and New York's 84 electoral votes are a given for any Dem -- That's 31% of the way to 270! How any Democrat can lose the Electoral vote with that advantage is mind blowing! So, I stand corrected. It does have meaning. It means she's a bigger Loser than I had imagined because she found a way to win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote by 74 votes. Sonny - why are you even arguing with him. You can't argue with an idiot. We won , they lost. Ff2 isn't done crying with the other losers who refuse to accept reality. It's so great watching them be miserable. It's like winning all over again. In fact, I found a video of ff2 from the other day: As I've stated, Trump won and deserved to. But Clinton got more votes. |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Dec 29, 2016 17:18:26 GMT -5
Sonny - why are you even arguing with him. You can't argue with an idiot. We won , they lost. Ff2 isn't done crying with the other losers who refuse to accept reality. It's so great watching them be miserable. It's like winning all over again. In fact, I found a video of ff2 from the other day: As I've stated, Trump won and deserved to. But Clinton got more votes. Yes yes, but what's up with the crying in that video you posted on Facebook? I know your super upset, but man get a grip! On the positive side, you look like you lost a little weight. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 29, 2016 17:21:55 GMT -5
As I've stated, Trump won and deserved to. But Clinton got more votes. Yes yes, but what's up with the crying in that video you posted on Facebook? I know your super upset, but man get a grip! On the positive side, you look like you lost a little weight. Don't you know how to embed a video?  |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Dec 29, 2016 17:22:19 GMT -5
Sonny - why are you even arguing with him. You can't argue with an idiot. We won , they lost. Ff2 isn't done crying with the other losers who refuse to accept reality. It's so great watching them be miserable. It's like winning all over again. In fact, I found a video of ff2 from the other day: As I've stated, Trump won and deserved to. But Clinton got more votes. I'm not arguing. FF2 and I are just having a discussion. He's obviously on the losing end of the discussion (and knows it), but that's bedsides the point. I've met plenty of Lib Idiots (lived 3 years in Boston), and FF2 is not one of them. |
|
