|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 23, 2015 11:47:35 GMT -5
so in "A Few Good Men" there's a scene where tom cruise has one of the officers on the stand, the officer is smugly talking about how when he gives an order, it's the word of god and his men wouldn't dare go against it...then cruise nails him with something like "well then if you gave the order not to touch private Santiago, and your men always listen to orders, why then would they go fuck him up?" during SparklePony's press conference he said "once i get the balls ready just the way i like them, nobody's allowed to touch them or do anything to them at all." so then tell me mr. SparklePony; if you make it clear that nobody i mean NOBODY is allowed to do anything to the balls once they're the way you like them, why would some ballboy take it upon himself to mess with your balls? the pig is ripe and lying Who ordered the Code Red?
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jan 23, 2015 12:12:00 GMT -5
Nice. Thanks for posting. Reminds me of the old Eagles song, "You can't hide your Lyin Eyes"
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jan 23, 2015 12:14:45 GMT -5
Nothing coming of this until after superbowl. Of Course i knew this
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jan 23, 2015 12:14:58 GMT -5
Nice. Thanks for posting. Reminds me of the old Eagles song, "You can't hide your Lyin Eyes" Fuck the Eagles. Those dbags are better individually than together.
|
|
|
Post by dmitexxi on Jan 23, 2015 12:34:21 GMT -5
Fatcessa was dead on. Not once did BB or SparklePony ever admit to being embarrassed or upset about it, or wanting to find out what happened and how it happened. And for the league to not even have talked to SparklePony about this 4 days later seems to thing the NFL is going to drag this out past the SB. Morons. At least OJ committed to finding the real killer.... Gold Jerry GOLD!!
|
|
|
Post by dmitexxi on Jan 23, 2015 12:42:15 GMT -5
Holy shit ESPN is filled with a bunch of fucking idiots. They just had some "scientist" come on and talk about how it's possible for the football to lose air pressure because of cold weather. True But what the fuck does this prove? The footballs on the Colts sideline were all filled to regulation. Does mother nature only effect the Flats* footballs or some shit? Are you syre about those 5 minutes!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Jan 23, 2015 12:44:15 GMT -5
Holy shit ESPN is filled with a bunch of fucking idiots. They just had some "scientist" come on and talk about how it's possible for the football to lose air pressure because of cold weather. True But what the fuck does this prove? The footballs on the Colts sideline were all filled to regulation. Does mother nature only effect the Flats* footballs or some shit? The laws of physics cease to exist in footballs in Foxboro
|
|
|
Post by greengeek on Jan 23, 2015 18:06:53 GMT -5
OK...I saw this one coming...let's go: PV=nRT requires that the pressures and temperatures be expressed as "absolute" quantities. Typical air pressure is 14.7 psi. A fully deflated ball (e.g. cut by a knife) has 14.7 psi. When the pressure is measured by a ref, this is a so-called "gauge pressure". a 13.0 psi gauge pressure is therefore 14.7+13.0 = 27.7 psi which is 191,000 Pascals absolute pressure. ( link ) Let's say that the ball was initially at equilibrium in a rather warm room...80 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature should also be expressed on an absolute scale and 80 degrees Fahrenheit is 300 Kelvin ( link ). The temperature on the field was 51 Fahrenheit which is 283.7 Kelvin ( link ). If noone lets air out of the ball, then n is a constant, V is nearly constant, and R is always a constant. Thus we find: p1/T1 = p2/T2 or p2 = T2/T1 * p1...leading to p2 = 26.2 psi absolute pressure. This is a grand total of 11.5 psi...1.5 psi lower than the initial. 2 psi lower than legal is 2.5 psi lower than 13.0 (not 1.5) That said...the story I heard includes the following facts: - The refs took measured the pressure at half time (presumably back indoors so the calculation is moot).
- The refs also measured the balls from the Colts balls and got all within compliance (supporting the prior conjecture).
- If the calculation is repeated using a normal temp room (72 degrees), a 13.0 psi ball drops to 12.0 outside.
- The volume is not truly constant and therefore the pressure drop is smaller than these calculations.
End result: The Deflatriots cheated (AGAIN). Q.E.D.
You are very smart.
What do you know about weather? Could you be our better version of CookieMonsta on this site?
No weather, just nuclear physics. So if you wanna know the phase transition temperature from hadron gas to quark-gluon-plasma at or near zero baryon chemical potential, I'm your guy.
|
|
|
Post by greengeek on Jan 23, 2015 18:19:40 GMT -5
OK...I saw this one coming...let's go: PV=nRT requires that the pressures and temperatures be expressed as "absolute" quantities. Typical air pressure is 14.7 psi. A fully deflated ball (e.g. cut by a knife) has 14.7 psi. When the pressure is measured by a ref, this is a so-called "gauge pressure". a 13.0 psi gauge pressure is therefore 14.7+13.0 = 27.7 psi which is 191,000 Pascals absolute pressure. ( link ) Let's say that the ball was initially at equilibrium in a rather warm room...80 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature should also be expressed on an absolute scale and 80 degrees Fahrenheit is 300 Kelvin ( link ). The temperature on the field was 51 Fahrenheit which is 283.7 Kelvin ( link ). If noone lets air out of the ball, then n is a constant, V is nearly constant, and R is always a constant. Thus we find: p1/T1 = p2/T2 or p2 = T2/T1 * p1...leading to p2 = 26.2 psi absolute pressure. This is a grand total of 11.5 psi...1.5 psi lower than the initial. 2 psi lower than legal is 2.5 psi lower than 13.0 (not 1.5) That said...the story I heard includes the following facts: - The refs took measured the pressure at half time (presumably back indoors so the calculation is moot).
- The refs also measured the balls from the Colts balls and got all within compliance (supporting the prior conjecture).
- If the calculation is repeated using a normal temp room (72 degrees), a 13.0 psi ball drops to 12.0 outside.
- The volume is not truly constant and therefore the pressure drop is smaller than these calculations.
End result: The Deflatriots cheated (AGAIN). Q.E.D.
Since there's no geek award, you get The Extra Mile Award Thanks!!!
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on Jan 23, 2015 19:05:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Jan 24, 2015 7:05:53 GMT -5
You are very smart.
What do you know about weather? Could you be our better version of CookieMonsta on this site?
No weather, just nuclear physics. So if you wanna know the phase transition temperature from hadron gas to quark-gluon-plasma at or near zero baryon chemical potential, I'm your guy. What's your thoughts on dark matter?
|
|
|
Post by Can'tGetEnoughJizzInMyMouth on Jan 24, 2015 12:29:50 GMT -5
Obviously Brunnell is a better QB than SparklePony is.... Obviously only one is a liar who's jerkoff fans will defend until the end of time because either they're just as gay as SparklePony or are dumb fucking idiots who buy into this bullshit You hate us, cause you aint us..... LMFAO......
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Jan 24, 2015 13:10:38 GMT -5
Obviously only one is a liar who's jerkoff fans will defend until the end of time because either they're just as gay as SparklePony or are dumb fucking idiots who buy into this bullshit You hate us, cause you aint us..... LMFAO...... Actually I am glad we 'ain't yous' - I would have a hard time rooting for a POS cheating football team - but that's just me. I like my sports sporting. And apparently you care more about 'us' than you think - what with all the posting/trolling on Jets board.
|
|
|
Post by Can'tGetEnoughJizzInMyMouth on Jan 24, 2015 13:30:32 GMT -5
You hate us, cause you aint us..... LMFAO...... Actually I am glad we 'ain't yous' - I would have a hard time rooting for a POS cheating football team - but that's just me. I like my sports sporting. And apparently you care more about 'us' than you think - what with all the posting/trolling on Jets board. Jets boards are the best place to get NEP news.....
|
|
|
Post by greengeek on Jan 24, 2015 13:56:20 GMT -5
No weather, just nuclear physics. So if you wanna know the phase transition temperature from hadron gas to quark-gluon-plasma at or near zero baryon chemical potential, I'm your guy. What's your thoughts on dark matter? No one can tell you what dark matter is since no one knows. The phrase "Dark Matter" can be considered word-by-word. "Dark" means that you can't see it with a telescope via electromagnetic radiation (no light...no radio...no Xrays...). "Matter" means that the effects of this material's gravity are not only observed, but quite significant. One difficulty is that we simply don't have a theory that includes both gravity and nature's other forces in a single framework. The Quantum Field Theory realization known as the Standard Model (grandchild of Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schreodinger) governs electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces. General Relativity (Einstein) governs gravitation. Don't be fooled by studies like Hawking Radiation that are described as including both...this is a kluge the argues that a precisely positioned event horizon of a black hole can't be real since quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle "fuzz" any such boundary leading to "leakage" from inside a black hole. This is a kluge, not a theory. When I can tell you with reasonable certainty is what dark matter is not. Coming from the QFT perspective (high energy and nuclear physics) the simple minded solution is to invent yet another new particle (as yet not seen) that would have the desired character. One such proposition is the dark photon. This link: ( PHENIX paper on Dark Photons)
describes a search for dark photons as realized in the decay of pions published by me and my colleagues. Within currently understood limits we claim that the window for dark photons is closed. So that is one things that dark matter is not. Another avenue is "supersymmetry" (SUSY). If any supersymmetric particles exist in nature, the lightest of them would be perfectly stable. These are known to not exist as charged particles from my thesis result in 1989. Neutral supersymmetric particles at LHC is a currently open topic. In the so-called "Minimal SuperSymmetric Model" (MSSM) LHC would have seen huge number of these in the first few minutes. They didn't so a MSSM neutral supersymmetric particle is out. There are other variants of SUSY which are still under investigation. So, dark matter is not a dark photon, and maybe not SUSY (at least not MSSM SUSY). What it actually is, I dunno, but then again neither does anyone else.
|
|