|
|
Post by Slackjaw on Mar 27, 2015 12:39:15 GMT -5
"Beli-cheat also brought up the issue last year, with the league apparently not too interested in taking up the issue. “We just spent however many millions of dollars on the replay system,” Belidick told reporters last year. “I mean, there are 1,000 cameras in every stadium, so if somebody spills a beer on somebody, we have it on record, right? Maybe we could have a bake sale to raise some money for the cameras. We could do a car wash.” But the NFL did take on one issue related to Bill Belidick this year. The league banned the use of ineligible players outside the tackle box, a loophole Belidick had exploited during the playoffs this year against the Baltimore Ravens. The NFL also added what’s being called the “Julian Edelman rule,” allowing a spotter in the booth to have a player taken off the field if it appears they have suffered a head injury. The New England Patriots wide receiver appeared groggy after a hit in the fourth quarter of the Super Bowl. He remained in the game, making the winning touchdown catch." www.inquisitr.com/1956624/new-england-patriots-rumors-bill-Belidick-goes-on-angry-rant-over-nfl-rule-changes/The end zone cameras is another attempt to legitimize "Spygate" tactics. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 27, 2015 12:46:23 GMT -5
.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 27, 2015 12:52:04 GMT -5
Wore this beauty to the parade!  |
|
|
|
Post by vin on Mar 27, 2015 13:02:39 GMT -5
Amazing how you are supposed to be one of the better Flats* trolls here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slackjaw on Mar 27, 2015 13:05:29 GMT -5
Wore this beauty to the parade! Priceless  |
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on Mar 27, 2015 13:07:18 GMT -5
I hate Belicheat as much as the next guy and see the irony here but can't say I really disagree with him about the end-zone cameras...with the amount of money the NFL has there's no room for ambiguity on calls that could easily be determined with good camera placement
|
|
|
|
Post by PK on Mar 27, 2015 13:17:40 GMT -5
I hate Belicheat as much as the next guy and see the irony here but can't say I really disagree with him about the end-zone cameras...with the amount of money the NFL has there's no room for ambiguity on calls that could easily be determined with good camera placement True. Although...I can't remember many times that it was an issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Slackjaw on Mar 27, 2015 13:26:19 GMT -5
I hate Belicheat as much as the next guy and see the irony here but can't say I really disagree with him about the end-zone cameras...with the amount of money the NFL has there's no room for ambiguity on calls that could easily be determined with good camera placement True. Although...I can't remember many times that it was an issue. Not really an issue at all. |
|
|
|
Post by PK on Mar 27, 2015 13:31:39 GMT -5
True. Although...I can't remember many times that it was an issue. Not really an issue at all. I didn't think so. And I don't remember any times that is was an issue to the Fagtriots. Makes you wonder why fuckface is throwing such a hissy fit about it. (ok...actually it doesn't make you wonder) |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Mar 27, 2015 13:34:14 GMT -5
Belicheat complaining about cameras! OH THE IRONING! Fuck the Flats*
|
|
|
|
Post by Slackjaw on Mar 27, 2015 13:40:54 GMT -5
Not really an issue at all. I didn't think so. And I don't remember any times that is was an issue to the Fagtriots. Makes you wonder why fuckface is throwing such a hissy fit about it. (ok...actually it doesn't make you wonder) I really do believe he wants permission to see film of other teams plays there are enough cameras to catch what is going on in end zone. The NFL has the money for this...perhaps they too know what kind of cheating bastard Beli-cheat is |
|
|
|
Post by JetBidi on Mar 27, 2015 15:20:37 GMT -5
Wore this beauty to the parade! Obviously not that one. Your shirt was at least 3 sizes bigger. |
|
|
|
Post by rangerous on Mar 27, 2015 17:13:35 GMT -5
I hate Belicheat as much as the next guy and see the irony here but can't say I really disagree with him about the end-zone cameras...with the amount of money the NFL has there's no room for ambiguity on calls that could easily be determined with good camera placement it's because of guys like bellichicken and kraft bringing up all of those issues like one handed grabs or circus catches that forced the rule changes that brought us the strict two feet in bounds or football move after the catch. football ove after the catch? wtf does that mean? simms says it all the time. so screw bellichicken if he thinks the nfl is wasting money. what's he afraid of anyway? |
|
|
|
Post by Jetworks on Mar 27, 2015 17:33:42 GMT -5
Wore this beauty to the parade! Obviously not that one. Your shirt was at least 3 sizes bigger.  TUND!!! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 21:04:03 GMT -5
Not really an issue at all. I didn't think so. And I don't remember any times that is was an issue to the Fagtriots. Makes you wonder why fuckface is throwing such a hissy fit about it. (ok...actually it doesn't make you wonder) Trying to figure out exactly when the ball breaks the plane is not really an issue? Umm, ok. You do realize like 99% of BB haters are in favor of his proposal, right? Hell, even Deadspin thinks people are idiots for not being on his side. It's common sense to want cameras there to give a more accurate ruling, all fans want this. If you want to get in on the "hate hate hate," think of a new way he could exploit it. Kind of like creative writing homework. |
|
