|
Post by jetfrantik on Jun 11, 2015 17:53:57 GMT -5
The Famous Jets win the AFC East with a 12-4 record!!
Play the Green Bay Packers in Super Bowl 50 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jun 11, 2015 18:18:24 GMT -5
OP should be banned burned and buried for this
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jun 11, 2015 18:21:34 GMT -5
It's all dependent on the QB position - and I'm not optimistic. 7-9
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Jun 11, 2015 20:37:21 GMT -5
It's all dependent on the QB position - and I'm not optimistic. 7-9 Are you whacking it to Blanche again?
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Jun 12, 2015 10:38:28 GMT -5
Should have taken that WR from West Virgina w/ the first pick. If we did, we'd be 11-5 this year. But we went D AGAIN as always so the O is gonna struggle. Again. Idzik blew it in 2014 and now this.
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Jun 13, 2015 12:57:11 GMT -5
Should have taken that WR from West Virgina w/ the first pick. If we did, we'd be 11-5 this year. But we went D AGAIN as always so the O is gonna struggle. Again. Idzik blew it in 2014 and now this. We have two guys on the DL who are looking for $100MM contracts. We can't afford that. Drafting into that position gives leverage against both contracts which in turn will free money elsewhere on the roster, like offense. It's not like we didn't address WR in the offseason. We brought in a guy who can be our #1 on day one.
|
|
|
Post by ash1962 on Jun 14, 2015 9:38:30 GMT -5
1-15
LOL
Too much optimism and too many homers here. Thought I'd be different. Of course I do not really believe we will go 1-15.
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Jun 15, 2015 1:54:48 GMT -5
Should have taken that WR from West Virgina w/ the first pick. If we did, we'd be 11-5 this year. But we went D AGAIN as always so the O is gonna struggle. Again. Idzik blew it in 2014 and now this. If we drafted a player who's name you don't know we would have been 11-5 and taking the best player in the draft was on a level of Idzik? Its hard to be this lost. How the fuck can so many be so pessimistic this time of the year? Have to go at least 10-6, its time to be an optimist.
|
|
|
Post by jets.penguin on Jun 15, 2015 7:59:35 GMT -5
1-15 LOL Too much optimism and too many homers here. Thought I'd be different. Of course I do not really believe we will go 1-15. you suck and spit
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Jun 15, 2015 9:50:50 GMT -5
1-15 LOL Too much optimism and too many homers here. Thought I'd be different. Of course I do not really believe we will go 1-15. you suck and spitThere's a lot of optimism here - based on pretty much - nothing. Other than the cornerback position being greatly improved. No one knows how good of a coach Bowles will be. But improving the secondary and getting one good WR will win us 5-6 more games
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Jun 15, 2015 11:05:13 GMT -5
There's a lot of optimism here - based on pretty much - nothing. Other than the cornerback position being greatly improved. No one knows how good of a coach Bowles will be. But improving the secondary and getting one good WR will win us 5-6 more games I predicted 10 wins and it was not based on nothing -- it was based on 3 factors: Turnover Margin, Red Zone Offense and schedule. Last year we were 29th in the league in TO margin, including a ridiculous -15 during the 1-8 start that killed the season; 3 turnovers forced and 18 given up through 9 games. With the upgrades in the secondary, we should be able to force more TOs than last year, which shoudl even out the TO margin even if we do not cut back on the TOs on offense. Over the last 6 years, we have been about 30 games below .500 when we lost the TO battle and 30 games above when we win it. Limiting TOs and forcing TOs can go a long way to turning things around this season. Better TO margin could be worth 1-3 more wins. Red Zone offense was dead last in the league last season -- scoring TDs on 36% of our red zone opportunities. The addition of Marshall and a healthy Decker -- along with Amaro give our QB (whoever he may be) 3 big red zone targets. Eliminate the cute gimmick offense we often ran in the red zone and we should improve this season. Last year we lost one game in OT and 3 more games by 3 points or less. Better red zone offense could also be worth 1 to 3 more wins. Our offense does not need to be great -- in my opinion, we just need to take care of the ball and convert at league average rate in the red zone to be a much better team. Last point was the schedule. Assume we go 3-3 in our Division and 2-2 against NFC East. I don't think 3-1 against AFC South is out of the question. We should beat Tenn & Jax at home and Houston is beatable in their building. That leaves two games against Oakland and Cleveland to get to 10. Is it an optimistic view. Absolutely. But it is not based on nothing and I don't think it is out of the realm of possibility.
|
|
|
Post by jetstream23 on Jun 15, 2015 17:55:20 GMT -5
There's a lot of optimism here - based on pretty much - nothing. Other than the cornerback position being greatly improved. No one knows how good of a coach Bowles will be. But improving the secondary and getting one good WR will win us 5-6 more games Well let's see. We've got two guys who are not John Idzik and Rex Ryan so that's a start. But those guys still don't have a solid QB, they went and got the same two CBs that helped take Rex to the two AFC Championship games, and almost comedicly by happenstance they drafted yet ANOTHER defensive lineman in the Top 10. I kinda feel like I'm in a fricken time machine. For all intensive purposes this is a remarkably similar team to the 2009-2011 Jets. Everyone in their mother knows this. So the question is whether we should really expect different results?
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Jun 15, 2015 18:23:27 GMT -5
There's a lot of optimism here - based on pretty much - nothing. Other than the cornerback position being greatly improved. No one knows how good of a coach Bowles will be. But improving the secondary and getting one good WR will win us 5-6 more games Well let's see. We've got two guys who are not John Idzik and Rex Ryan so that's a start. But those guys still don't have a solid QB, they went and got the same two CBs that helped take Rex to the two AFC Championship games, and almost comedicly by happenstance they drafted yet ANOTHER defensive lineman in the Top 10. I kinda feel like I'm in a fricken time machine. For all intensive purposes this is a remarkably similar team to the 2009-2011 Jets. Everyone in their mother knows this. So the question is whether we should really expect different results? LOL @ the HItmanisms, oops youthanisms. The big unknown there IMO is Bowles, no one really knows if he's any good at head coaching. The other is the QB - Sanchez may not be all pro but I'd take him in a heartbeat over Geno Smith. It's actually a little spooky how similar this team, and this coach, appears to be to the Rex Ryan coached Jets, in all but personality. Which to me is the least significnt factor.
|
|
|
Post by eboozer32 on Jun 16, 2015 7:12:31 GMT -5
There's a lot of optimism here - based on pretty much - nothing. Other than the cornerback position being greatly improved. No one knows how good of a coach Bowles will be. But improving the secondary and getting one good WR will win us 5-6 more games Well let's see. We've got two guys who are not John Idzik and Rex Ryan so that's a start. But those guys still don't have a solid QB, they went and got the same two CBs that helped take Rex to the two AFC Championship games, and almost comedicly by happenstance they drafted yet ANOTHER defensive lineman in the Top 10. I kinda feel like I'm in a fricken time machine. For all intensive purposes this is a remarkably similar team to the 2009-2011 Jets. Everyone in their mother knows this. So the question is whether we should really expect different results? #CommonSence!!
|
|
|
Post by eboozer32 on Jun 16, 2015 7:13:37 GMT -5
There's a lot of optimism here - based on pretty much - nothing. Other than the cornerback position being greatly improved. No one knows how good of a coach Bowles will be. But improving the secondary and getting one good WR will win us 5-6 more games I predicted 10 wins and it was not based on nothing -- it was based on 3 factors: Turnover Margin, Red Zone Offense and schedule. Last year we were 29th in the league in TO margin, including a ridiculous -15 during the 1-8 start that killed the season; 3 turnovers forced and 18 given up through 9 games. With the upgrades in the secondary, we should be able to force more TOs than last year, which shoudl even out the TO margin even if we do not cut back on the TOs on offense. Over the last 6 years, we have been about 30 games below .500 when we lost the TO battle and 30 games above when we win it. Limiting TOs and forcing TOs can go a long way to turning things around this season. Better TO margin could be worth 1-3 more wins. Red Zone offense was dead last in the league last season -- scoring TDs on 36% of our red zone opportunities. The addition of Marshall and a healthy Decker -- along with Amaro give our QB (whoever he may be) 3 big red zone targets. Eliminate the cute gimmick offense we often ran in the red zone and we should improve this season. Last year we lost one game in OT and 3 more games by 3 points or less. Better red zone offense could also be worth 1 to 3 more wins. Our offense does not need to be great -- in my opinion, we just need to take care of the ball and convert at league average rate in the red zone to be a much better team. Last point was the schedule. Assume we go 3-3 in our Division and 2-2 against NFC East. I don't think 3-1 against AFC South is out of the question. We should beat Tenn & Jax at home and Houston is beatable in their building. That leaves two games against Oakland and Cleveland to get to 10. Is it an optimistic view. Absolutely. But it is not based on nothing and I don't think it is out of the realm of possibility. #SCIENCE!!
|
|