|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 21, 2014 20:01:18 GMT -5
It's the angle of the shot. You're an angle. Life is all about perspective.
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Dec 21, 2014 20:16:37 GMT -5
Life is all about perspective. What's the angle going to be when you wake up in a hole and im standing there with a shovel?
|
|
|
Post by razorjet on Dec 21, 2014 20:17:59 GMT -5
It's the angle of the shot. Go blow yourself This is how a board administrator SHOULD respond to something like this. Love this place already
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 21, 2014 20:22:38 GMT -5
Life is all about perspective. What's the angle going to be when you wake up in a hole and im standing there with a shovel? Ill assume you dug me out because you love me.
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Dec 21, 2014 21:23:14 GMT -5
Well it was marked short of a 1st down, clearly the officials wanted it to be a 1st down, they know Rex is a thick fucker so I'm guessing they thought they would see if they could get away with giving a 1st down on a down they already marked short. They succeeded. You get me? sure
|
|
|
Post by RayRay1 on Dec 22, 2014 1:24:05 GMT -5
It's the angle of the shot. Kill yourself you fat piece of shit!
|
|
|
Post by gibby on Dec 22, 2014 7:19:15 GMT -5
Believe it or not.... This isn't even the first time this has happened. Ironically enough both times vs the patriots. I remember back when Parcells was coaching the pats and it was Ben Coats. The refs gave him a first down then as well. Anyone else remember this? ?
|
|
|
Post by gibby on Dec 22, 2014 7:20:19 GMT -5
Both were right at the end of the game too!
|
|
|
Post by Fishooked on Dec 22, 2014 7:48:34 GMT -5
Someone explain this to me. This was measured on the field, the ref walked away and towards the Fagtriots line and then signalled a first down. Meanwhile, the scoreboard in the stadium read 4th down, and even the chain gang was confused. I'd like to believe this ref is not Bob Kraft's pocket, but what other explanation is there? That's not a straight-on shot, you can tell by the angle of the chain compared to the bottom of the screen (along with teh pixels). I saw it during the game and to me it looked like at most there was a half inch gap between the nose of the ball and marker. Awful job by CBS there....what the fuck? 99% of the time they show it clearly, but this was a colossal fuck up.
|
|
|
Post by leftturn3 on Dec 22, 2014 7:48:54 GMT -5
Someone explain this to me. This was measured on the field, the ref walked away and towards the Fagtriots line and then signalled a first down. Meanwhile, the scoreboard in the stadium read 4th down, and even the chain gang was confused. I'd like to believe this ref is not Bob Kraft's pocket, but what other explanation is there? That's not a straight-on shot, you can tell by the angle of the chain compared to the bottom of the screen (along with teh pixels). I saw it during the game and to me it looked like at most there was a half inch gap between the nose of the ball and marker. You had a better view durring the game, it was straight on. When they where measuring it seemed that the stick holder, ( ha ha, stick holder) was holding the pole not straight up and down, he was holding it leaning it towards the defense, as they pulled away you could clearly see he shifted so it leaned towards the offense bringing the pole more towards the ball. The pole straight up and down putthe ball short by about an inch, which is rediculouse. This sounds likes porno script. Also, on the challenge, and I sometimes do not know what they are looking at, I think they are so fixated on a knee that they forget about other body parts, there was one view where you clearly see the runners forearm come down with the ball in it right at the edge of the "5". Place the ball at that spot and they are short by 6 inches. Bottom line, NE lives and dies by the Sward, now way they punt, they go for it and pretty sure it is a lock to get the first down. This is is my take and I am pretty confident in it. Merry Christmas and don't shoot your load in the egg nogg.
|
|
|
Post by leftturn3 on Dec 22, 2014 7:50:19 GMT -5
And please, get rid of Gaygay1, please ban until he changes that sig.
|
|
|
Post by Fishooked on Dec 22, 2014 7:50:59 GMT -5
It's the angle of the shot. Kill yourself you fat piece of shit!
|
|
|
Post by gangrene on Dec 22, 2014 10:04:21 GMT -5
And please, get rid of Gaygay1, please ban until he changes that sig. Nah, too much fun
|
|
|
Post by vin on Dec 22, 2014 10:40:02 GMT -5
And please, get rid of Gaygay1, please ban until he changes that sig. You do realize that's actually RayRay being fucked with by the Mods here, right?
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 22, 2014 10:52:22 GMT -5
That's not a straight-on shot, you can tell by the angle of the chain compared to the bottom of the screen (along with teh pixels). I saw it during the game and to me it looked like at most there was a half inch gap between the nose of the ball and marker. Bottom line, NE lives and dies by the Sward, now way they punt, they go for it and pretty sure it is a lock to get the first down. WTF is a Sward?
|
|