|
Post by JStokes on Mar 5, 2017 11:32:23 GMT -5
3 with upside? Hackensuck has no upside. Worst QB in the history of football. Cut his worthless ass today. McCarran I'd be Ok with, but not Hackensuck. If Hackenberg starts and leads the jets to 14 losses, and the Jets get a top 2 pick in the draft, he may do more to insure the long term success of the franchise than any other player in their history. This. But I'm not sure Hack can even win 2 games. _
|
|
|
Post by MDL JET on Mar 5, 2017 11:46:03 GMT -5
3 with upside? Hackensuck has no upside. Worst QB in the history of football. Cut his worthless ass today. McCarran I'd be Ok with, but not Hackensuck. If Hackenberg starts and leads the jets to 14 losses, and the Jets get a top 2 pick in the draft, he may do more to insure the long term success of the franchise than any other player in their history. It's a win win starting Hack. If he gets you 6-7 wins, that could be a pretty good sign. If he sucks hard, then we end up with a nice pick next year. Don't over think this Mac.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2017 11:55:04 GMT -5
We obviously need more than two quarterbacks in the room and going into training camp. I'd give him Sheldon and take McCarran and a 3rd? This way we have three young quarterbacks with upside and 3/3's 3 with upside? Hackensuck has no upside. Worst QB in the history of football. Cut his worthless ass today. McCarran I'd be Ok with, but not Hackensuck. Where did you pick up your football acumen?
|
|
|
Post by vulgardisplayoffutbo on Mar 5, 2017 12:02:57 GMT -5
If Hackenberg starts and leads the jets to 14 losses, and the Jets get a top 2 pick in the draft, he may do more to insure the long term success of the franchise than any other player in their history. This. But I'm not sure Hack can even win 2 games. _ The less, the better. Take no chances, especially with the perpetual suckitude that is known as the Cleveland Browns.
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 5, 2017 12:08:39 GMT -5
This. But I'm not sure Hack can even win 2 games. _ The less, the better. Take no chances, especially with the perpetual suckitude that is known as the Cleveland Browns. With 12 draft picks and $100MM plus cap space, the Browns have to be good for at least 4 wins. But they are the Browns, so you never know.
|
|
|
Post by vulgardisplayoffutbo on Mar 5, 2017 12:14:25 GMT -5
The less, the better. Take no chances, especially with the perpetual suckitude that is known as the Cleveland Browns. With 12 draft picks and $100MM plus cap space, the Browns have to be good for at least 4 wins. But they are the Browns, so you never know. Hey, I will be a huge Browns fan this year lol.
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Mar 5, 2017 12:15:31 GMT -5
The less, the better. Take no chances, especially with the perpetual suckitude that is known as the Cleveland Browns. With 12 draft picks and $100MM plus cap space, the Browns have to be good for at least 4 wins. But they are the Browns, so you never know. But we still have the Bear, 9'ers and the Bills to content with.
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 5, 2017 12:20:49 GMT -5
With 12 draft picks and $100MM plus cap space, the Browns have to be good for at least 4 wins. But they are the Browns, so you never know. But we still have the Bear, 9'ers and the Bills to content with. And the Jags are always in the mix. Head to head games against the Bills, Jags and Browns are going to be huge. I may even drive to Cleveland and join the Dawg Pound for a day.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Mar 5, 2017 13:08:42 GMT -5
If Hackenberg starts and leads the jets to 14 losses, and the Jets get a top 2 pick in the draft, he may do more to insure the long term success of the franchise than any other player in their history. This. But I'm not sure Hack can even win 2 games. _ He may not be good enough to get on the field to start 2 games. But, I agree, if they stink so much to get a top pick and draft a franchise QB a year from now then it will have been worth it. But, who the hell knows.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Mar 5, 2017 13:59:57 GMT -5
This. But I'm not sure Hack can even win 2 games. _ He may not be good enough to get on the field to start 2 games. But, I agree, if they stink so much to get a top pick and draft a franchise QB a year from now then it will have been worth it. But, who the hell knows. I honestly don't think he'll ever see the field. _
|
|
|
Post by 2milehighJet on Mar 5, 2017 14:25:58 GMT -5
Remember years ago when a lot of us thought we should get Schaub out of Atlanta? Reminds me of this Glennon situation.
|
|
|
Post by crossfire on Mar 5, 2017 15:38:56 GMT -5
Remember years ago when a lot of us thought we should get Schaub out of Atlanta? Reminds me of this Glennon situation. I don't want a retread QB. I want a full rebuild with a QB taken very early in next years draft. I am tired of getting somebody else's crap.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2017 18:14:49 GMT -5
If Hackenberg starts and leads the jets to 14 losses, and the Jets get a top 2 pick in the draft, he may do more to insure the long term success of the franchise than any other player in their history. This. But I'm not sure Hack can even win 2 games. _ Good. Even better. Lose them all. The #2 pick in the draft won't be enough. I don't want to get stuck with the 2018 version of Ryan Leaf.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2017 22:33:41 GMT -5
Market for Glennon is reportedly $14-$15 million per year.
No thank you.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Mar 5, 2017 22:49:25 GMT -5
Market for Glennon is reportedly $14-$15 million per year. No thank you. No fucking way. _
|
|