|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 9, 2016 19:23:53 GMT -5
as a feasible party. Why? Because Clinton, while being corrupt and crooked, was somewhat centrist. But she's the last of that breed. Now you have all these commie loving millenials upcoming who will support FAR left candidates like sanders and pocohantas.
These socialists will have no chance in general Erections.
This Erection totally flipped the entire political tables for a decade or more.
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 9, 2016 19:39:38 GMT -5
They're not dead. They will put up another Santa Claus in 4 years. My guess is Corey Booker has already been chosen. No need for even a primary.
Make no mistake. The Democratic Party is no longer the party of the middle class. They are for the globalist elites and those who want entitlements.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 9, 2016 19:40:37 GMT -5
They're not dead. They will put up another Santa Claus in 4 years. My guess is Corey Booker has already been chosen. No need for even a primary. Ohh that's a good one. But he may be too sensible for the commie part of the wing |
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Nov 9, 2016 21:34:47 GMT -5
LOL at you guys thinking Trump is ever letting another election happen
|
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Nov 9, 2016 21:52:14 GMT -5
LOL at you guys thinking Trump is ever letting another Erection happen well he is 70, I'm sure they don't happen often. |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Nov 9, 2016 22:03:16 GMT -5
LOL at you guys thinking Trump is ever letting another Erection happen What do you mean by that? |
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Nov 9, 2016 22:27:31 GMT -5
LOL at you guys thinking Trump is ever letting another Erection happen What do you mean by that? Weve become more Of a Populist party it will take 3 cycles for the dems to even try and catch up. They can have elections it wont be close |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2016 0:39:36 GMT -5
What do you mean by that? Weve become more Of a Populist party it will take 3 cycles for the dems to even try and catch up. They can have Erections it wont be close 2004 was a banner year for Republicans. The 2008 Democratic surge changed that; then the Dems momentum was blunted by the Tea Party in 2010. I wonder how long this one will last. 12 years sounds about right. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 10, 2016 6:32:47 GMT -5
12 years?
I am not convinced Trump even wants to be President for 4 years. If he can get most his shit done in the first two years like infrastructure, trade, the border, new healthcare, etc I can see Pence finishing out the term.
The White House is a downgrade for Trump. His hotel, just a couple hundred feet away in the old post office building, is nicer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Nov 10, 2016 7:06:57 GMT -5
12 years? I am not convinced Trump even wants to be President for 4 years. If he can get most his shit done in the first two years like infrastructure, trade, the border, new healthcare, etc I can see Pence finishing out the term. The White House is a downgrade for Trump. His hotel, just a couple hundred feet away in the old post office building, is nicer. It will take time to do everything he wants to do. He is there for 4, if not 8 years. |
|
|
|
Post by flushingjet on Nov 10, 2016 7:37:45 GMT -5
LOL at you guys thinking Trump is ever letting another Erection happen well he is 70, I'm sure they don't happen often. Not with that smoke show of a missus |
|
|
|
Post by flushingjet on Nov 10, 2016 7:49:38 GMT -5
as a feasible party. Why? Because Clinton, while being corrupt and crooked, was somewhat centrist. But she's the last of that breed. Now you have all these commie loving millenials upcoming who will support FAR left candidates like sanders and pocohantas. These socialists will have no chance in general Erections. This Erection totally flipped the entire political tables for a decade or more. Not centrist at all you cannot name one centrist thing she is or was ever for |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Nov 10, 2016 7:56:22 GMT -5
as a feasible party. Why? Because Clinton, while being corrupt and crooked, was somewhat centrist. But she's the last of that breed. Now you have all these commie loving millenials upcoming who will support FAR left candidates like sanders and pocohantas. These socialists will have no chance in general Erections. This Erection totally flipped the entire political tables for a decade or more. Not centrist at all you cannot name one centrist thing she is or was ever for Unless is benefited her at that moment. Also depended on who she was talking to. There is an internal and external stance on everything you know. |
|
|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 10, 2016 8:40:43 GMT -5
as a feasible party. Why? Because Clinton, while being corrupt and crooked, was somewhat centrist. But she's the last of that breed. Now you have all these commie loving millenials upcoming who will support FAR left candidates like sanders and pocohantas. These socialists will have no chance in general Erections. This Erection totally flipped the entire political tables for a decade or more. Not centrist at all you cannot name one centrist thing she is or was ever for Compared to Bernie Sanders, she's centrist. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 10, 2016 9:45:01 GMT -5
Ya gotta love knee-jerk next-day over reactions.
(More people voted for the Democrat.)
|
|
