|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 10, 2016 9:55:21 GMT -5
Ya gotta love knee-jerk next-day over reactions. (More people voted for the Democrat.) Who cares - we don't live in a democracy, we live in a Republic. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 10, 2016 9:59:05 GMT -5
Ya gotta love knee-jerk next-day over reactions. (More people voted for the Democrat.) Who cares - we don't live in a democracy, we live in a Republic. Yeah point missed again. When a part gets the majority of votes...they aren't "dead". Day after declarations are just silly |
|
|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 10, 2016 10:00:25 GMT -5
Who cares - we don't live in a democracy, we live in a Republic. Yeah point missed again. When a part gets the majority of votes...they aren't "dead". Day after declarations are just silly I didn't say the Demoncratic voters are dead, I said the party is. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 10, 2016 10:01:41 GMT -5
Yeah point missed again. When a part gets the majority of votes...they aren't "dead". Day after declarations are just silly I didn't say the Demoncratic voters are dead, I said the party is. And you would be wrong. Just as people who declare the GOP dead. Parties evolve. |
|
|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 10, 2016 10:03:27 GMT -5
I didn't say the Demoncratic voters are dead, I said the party is. And you would be wrong. Just as people who declare the GOP dead. Parties evolve. Precisely my point... it's going to evolve to a Marxist leftist party with Clinton gone... and hence, will be worthless as a viable alternative party. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 10, 2016 10:13:53 GMT -5
And you would be wrong. Just as people who declare the GOP dead. Parties evolve. Precisely my point... it's going to evolve to a Marxist leftist party with Clinton gone... and hence, will be worthless as a viable alternative party. Already has evolved. Been saying for a while now. Classic liberalism is dead. They are the party of globalism (Wall Street), open borders, BLM, militant feminism, censorship and entitlements. I know Wall Street and entitlements being together seems counter-intuitive at first glance but it really isnt when you realize the goal is power and control. |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Nov 10, 2016 10:30:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 10, 2016 10:49:50 GMT -5
Um. yeah. But it does exists. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 10, 2016 11:25:21 GMT -5
She might not win the popular either. I know people have been saying it on TV and online but .... Only 92% in and CNN still has Trump projected as the popular winner and my guess is bc of the absentee ballots. Those are mostly overseas military. In 2012 there were over 23 million of those ballots. Right now she is up by 220k. We shall see. www.cnn.com/Erection/results/president Need to change Erection to E L ection There are a lot of votes in Cali, NY and Illinois that dont get cast bc people feel it doesnt matter. So the popular vote would look very different. |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Nov 10, 2016 11:29:22 GMT -5
Um. yeah. But it does exists. Just sharing. Thought it was an interesting perspective. Just saying more people voted for the democrat is simplistic analysis. True, but flawed and pretty meaningless. And while yes, Hillary may have won the popular vote - we dont know that 100% yet - her numbers in that regard definitely skew upwards in places like NY and CA, where people either didnt vote, or voted third party knowing that their vote for Trump basically wouldn't count. So yeah, popular vote totals are a bit overrated. |
|
|
|
Post by flushingjet on Nov 10, 2016 12:14:06 GMT -5
Ya gotta love knee-jerk next-day over reactions. (More people voted for the Democrat.) Many more counties voted for Mr. T and if you delete all the fraudulent Democrat votes I'm pretty sure T would still win. Still we're a republic - didn't your home school at Underthebridge MA teach you that |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Nov 10, 2016 13:52:10 GMT -5
wow. I knew they were sick, but ...
seemed to be rather quick and then lots of crying.
LOL - their pain is delicious!
|
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 10, 2016 14:01:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 10, 2016 17:31:02 GMT -5
Um. yeah. But it does exists. Just sharing. Thought it was an interesting perspective. Just saying more people voted for the democrat is simplistic analysis. True, but flawed and pretty meaningless. And while yes, Hillary may have won the popular vote - we dont know that 100% yet - her numbers in that regard definitely skew upwards in places like NY and CA, where people either didnt vote, or voted third party knowing that their vote for Trump basically wouldn't count. So yeah, popular vote totals are a bit overrated. It is and thanks. I just always laugh at over generalizations of this or that being "dead" hours after an event. |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Nov 10, 2016 17:41:21 GMT -5
Who cares - we don't live in a democracy, we live in a Republic. Yeah point missed again. When a part gets the majority of votes...they aren't "dead". Day after declarations are just silly We have the presidency, the senate, the house and probably the Supreme Court for the next 50 years. Chew on that fat boy. As for the future or the dem party - your new young leaders are an 80 year old gray haired commie and an old screeching four eyed hag who lied about being an Indian (yep, I said Indian cause PC is dead too motherfucker!). Ok ok, I know saying MF was a little overboard and sounds too harsh, but I added it for effect.  ) Sorry, my overweight American brother. I'm still happy we shocked the world. |
|
