|
|
Post by quantum on Jan 3, 2017 16:02:57 GMT -5
I'll take the word of the recipients over yours. They know the gravy train is ending. Thank you republicans I don't think you know what a gravy train is. for a minute there I thought this would devolve into a gravy train vs sauce train fiasco... |
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jan 3, 2017 16:14:23 GMT -5
I don't think you know what a gravy train is. for a minute there I thought this would devolve into a gravy train vs sauce train fiasco... It's fucking sauce. Any stupid American-born guinea who calls it "gravy" is a stupid American-born guinea. |
|
|
|
Post by southside on Jan 3, 2017 20:41:55 GMT -5
for a minute there I thought this would devolve into a gravy train vs sauce train fiasco... It's fucking sauce. Any stupid American-born guinea who calls it "gravy" is a stupid American-born guinea. I'm an American that was born in NJ who happens to be of Italian/Sicilian descent... I call it sauce. GFY |
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Jan 5, 2017 21:43:00 GMT -5
Trump is going to ask Congress to appropriate money for the wall. I.E. You and I (unless you're Mexican) are paying for this
|
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Jan 6, 2017 1:05:56 GMT -5
Trump is going to ask Congress to appropriate money for the wall. I.E. You and I (unless you're Mexican) are paying for this I'm shocked Mexico isn't going to be paying for this wall that kind of already exists. Maybe we'll settle for a suitcase full of i.o.u.'s from mexico. That's kind of like them paying for it. So the swamp isn't drained and we're paying for the wall. At least America will hopefully be great again, once we figure out exactly what that even means. Sure is catchy though. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 6, 2017 9:32:18 GMT -5
Wall pays for itself once we tilt the trade deficits with Mexico a little back to our favor. And off the books jobs taken by illegals who send the money back to Mexico tax free go bye-bye.
|
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Jan 6, 2017 9:47:52 GMT -5
I'll gladly help pay for the wall
I'd rather my tax dollars go towards something useful instead of arming fuckheads in Syria like Obama and Hillary were so gung-ho on.
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 6, 2017 9:58:36 GMT -5
I'll gladly help pay for the wall I'd rather my tax dollars go towards something useful instead of arming fuckheads in Syria like Obama and Hillary were so gung-ho on. All of a sudden liberals are concerned with $8 billion in spending. Obama ran trillion dollar deficits. We have a $58 billion yearly trade deficit with Mexico. We cut into that by just 10% and the wall is paid for in 2 years. |
|
|
|
Post by maury77 on Jan 6, 2017 10:00:05 GMT -5
I rarely venture into this part of the site and, after perusing through this thread, it seems like a smart move. I'm not shocked in the least that Trump is asking Congress to pay for the wall, his funding proposal was patently ridiculous from the moment he offered it. I'm not paying for that fucking wall and I will protest my ass off to make sure it does not happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by maury77 on Jan 6, 2017 10:04:12 GMT -5
I'll gladly help pay for the wall I'd rather my tax dollars go towards something useful instead of arming fuckheads in Syria like Obama and Hillary were so gung-ho on. All of a sudden liberals are concerned with $8 billion in spending. Obama ran trillion dollar deficits. We have a $58 billion yearly trade deficit with Mexico. We cut into that by just 10% and the wall is paid for in 2 years. So you are fine with running deficits as long as its being done by a party that you support? The fact that the debt increased under the prior administration doesn't support increasing it even further. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 6, 2017 10:09:57 GMT -5
All of a sudden liberals are concerned with $8 billion in spending. Obama ran trillion dollar deficits. We have a $58 billion yearly trade deficit with Mexico. We cut into that by just 10% and the wall is paid for in 2 years. So you are fine with running deficits as long as its being done by a party that you support? The fact that the debt increased under the prior administration doesn't support increasing it even further. No. I dont like deficits. But it is important to have perspective and context. Nothing is black and white and not all spending is equal. We are talking trillion dollar programs under Obama versus an $8 billion wall. I support "the wall" and think it will be a good investment. I also think universal Pre-K is a good investment. I also support free breakfast and lunch in schools. |
|
|
|
Post by maury77 on Jan 6, 2017 10:11:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 6, 2017 10:19:51 GMT -5
Why do you believe the wall is a good investment? Because I believe it will significantly impede illegal immigration as well as the flow of narcotics. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 6, 2017 10:25:01 GMT -5
Thats Washington math. And that deal had tax hikes with the promise of reduction in spending. Like most of those deficit reduction plans have. But when has Washington ever reduced spending? If they were real about it the tax increases and cuts needs to come at the same time. Because in Washington "cuts" means a decrease to the rate of increase. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Jan 6, 2017 10:40:00 GMT -5
I'll gladly help pay for the wall I'd rather my tax dollars go towards something useful instead of arming fuckheads in Syria like Obama and Hillary were so gung-ho on. All of a sudden liberals are concerned with $8 billion in spending. Obama ran trillion dollar deficits. We have a $58 billion yearly trade deficit with Mexico. We cut into that by just 10% and the wall is paid for in 2 years. That's fine you're ok with paying for this wall, but that's not really the point. The point is he promised to make Mexico pay for the wall and now all of us have to pay for it. It was his first big campaign promise and now it's already changed before he's even in office. A lot of his campaign promises didn't make sense, but people bought into it. He's going to do everything and it's all going to be great. Didn't matter if it seemed possible or not and people ate it up. Now he's already backing out of this "mexico is paying for it" promise, so what's next? |
|
