|
Post by RobR on Nov 29, 2015 22:16:26 GMT -5
He's a guy that was a legit 290 coming out with almost no body fat. Fours years after he was drafted he should easily be able too handle 305 but our coaching staff asked him to cut 25 lbs. which he did. He needs a full offseason to put the weight on positively and played in the right position. Inside in a 4-3. True, he was a hell of player at 290 for a rookie. 10-15lbs shouldn't hurt him. I just wouldn't want him to lose his quickness off the snap. Even at 290 he was a pretty good run stopper His problem is Rex asked him too cut massive weight, which he did, never complained. It's going too be tough sledding for him to get back to 290-300 without putting on bad weight. If only we kept him inside and let him grow into his body.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Nov 29, 2015 22:29:57 GMT -5
LOL bro with his major crush all on Coples over here...
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Nov 29, 2015 22:41:24 GMT -5
LOL bro with his major crush all on Coples over here...
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Nov 29, 2015 22:44:19 GMT -5
LOL bro with his major crush all on Coples over here...
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Nov 29, 2015 22:54:11 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2015 23:48:05 GMT -5
All-Pro on a 4-3 defense next year, book it. Charlie Brown Haley
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2015 23:57:47 GMT -5
"Incident " "unclear " thanks Cimini Ain't no fucking incident. I'll show that weasly Fucker an incident The spaghetti incident?
|
|
|
Post by Jetworks on Nov 30, 2015 8:56:52 GMT -5
Coples sucks. Those sacks he got as a rookie were A) opportunistic or B) in garbage time. The whole "playing out of position" argument is moronic. It's not like he was being asked to play safety. Why was Sheldon so effective in Coples' role yesterday, with his belly fat and having missed the first 4 games? I'll tell you why; because he's a FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!! Coples is just cast as one. Now that he has to play against men who don't rely on simply overpowering a bunch of non-draftable boys, he's been shown to be the fraud that he is.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2015 9:03:21 GMT -5
The Fraud Squad.
|
|
|
Post by freestater on Nov 30, 2015 9:16:02 GMT -5
That looks like it should rhyme, but it doesn't. With certain brain-enhancing substances inhaled, one could drive oneself nutz trying to rhyme that. woah.
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Nov 30, 2015 10:21:19 GMT -5
Coples sucks. Those sacks he got as a rookie were A) opportunistic or B) in garbage time. The whole "playing out of position" argument is moronic. It's not like he was being asked to play safety. Why was Sheldon so effective in Coples' role yesterday, with his belly fat and having missed the first 4 games? I'll tell you why; because he's a FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!! Coples is just cast as one. Now that he has to play against men who don't rely on simply overpowering a bunch of non-draftable boys, he's been shown to be the fraud that he is. I'm with you. But for those that have insisted Coples just need to be playing with his hand in the dirt, I guess we're going to find out...
|
|
|
Post by HawkeyeJet on Nov 30, 2015 10:27:59 GMT -5
Coples sucks. Those sacks he got as a rookie were A) opportunistic or B) in garbage time. The whole "playing out of position" argument is moronic. It's not like he was being asked to play safety. Why was Sheldon so effective in Coples' role yesterday, with his belly fat and having missed the first 4 games? I'll tell you why; because he's a FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!! Coples is just cast as one. Now that he has to play against men who don't rely on simply overpowering a bunch of non-draftable boys, he's been shown to be the fraud that he is. Said it way better than I could.
|
|
|
Post by Paradis on Nov 30, 2015 10:37:56 GMT -5
Coples sucks. Those sacks he got as a rookie were A) opportunistic or B) in garbage time. The whole "playing out of position" argument is moronic. It's not like he was being asked to play safety. Why was Sheldon so effective in Coples' role yesterday, with his belly fat and having missed the first 4 games? I'll tell you why; because he's a FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!! Coples is just cast as one. Now that he has to play against men who don't rely on simply overpowering a bunch of non-draftable boys, he's been shown to be the fraud that he is. I get your (and other's) point about his lack of heart. And i agree, his head/heart haven't been in for a long time now. He sucked and had to go. But this bullshit about disregarding him playing out of position is for the birds. You know better, as does others here who've been dismissive about that fact. He earned his draft stock playing DT... that's how he rose to stardom at NC. The fact that some of you are even bringing up DE illustrates how little you know about where he ought to be playing. He's in an interior lineman. You move any other DT to OLB and you'll see the same results. So why the fck is OK to dismiss that?
|
|
|
Post by HawkeyeJet on Nov 30, 2015 11:17:57 GMT -5
Coples sucks. Those sacks he got as a rookie were A) opportunistic or B) in garbage time. The whole "playing out of position" argument is moronic. It's not like he was being asked to play safety. Why was Sheldon so effective in Coples' role yesterday, with his belly fat and having missed the first 4 games? I'll tell you why; because he's a FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!! Coples is just cast as one. Now that he has to play against men who don't rely on simply overpowering a bunch of non-draftable boys, he's been shown to be the fraud that he is. I get your (and other's) point about his lack of heart. And i agree, his head/heart haven't been in for a long time now. He sucked and had to go. But this bullshit about disregarding him playing out of position is for the birds. You know better, as does others here who've been dismissive about that fact. He earned his draft stock playing DT... that's how he rose to stardom at NC. The fact that some of you are even bringing up DE illustrates how little you know about where he ought to be playing. He's in an interior lineman. You move any other DT to OLB and you'll see the same results. So why the fck is OK to dismiss that? That's simply not true. You act as if he played strictly defensive tackle in College. His numbers at defensive tackle at Carolina were better at DT, but it's not as if he completely fell off a cliff. The main difference in his production is 2.5 sacks. Let's not act as if he was completely useless at DE in college. Sometimes it's about projecting attributes. If his North Carolina coaches and he himself really thought his future was at DT, then why would they move him after such production?
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Nov 30, 2015 11:26:50 GMT -5
If his North Carolina coaches and he himself really thought his future was at DT, then why would they move him after such production? UNC was a mess that year. A ton of players were suspended so they moved him out of necessity.
|
|