|
Post by JStokes on Apr 4, 2017 20:33:47 GMT -5
Mac's last presser: he threw both young QB's under the bus. "Josh will take Hack under his wing". "Both need to take this time to show what they have". "I don't know who will start - that's for Coach Bowles to explain...this spring...going forward..." Next time you call me a druggie, I'll bend down and kick you in the head. F asshoooo Honestly, I wake up in the morning, I read your posts from the left coast and I am flummoxed. _
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Apr 4, 2017 20:36:27 GMT -5
You have done way too many drugs or I haven't done enough for me to continue this conversation. Nothing you have said makes one iota of sense to me. I think it's time I finally get on the pot so I can figure out what you are talking about. _ That seems hurtful. All I said was Petty looks like the bad version of Sanchez. McCown is my bet to show the poise that will settle down the locker room; and will start. There are serious doubts about Petty and Hack. Even tho the Jets are keeping things quiet, isn't obvious that the Jets FO is unhappy with those players? You can say it's a reach but I have seen this before. I am sure you have. Yet you think we're drafting Trubisky at 6. But start McCown for 2 years. Which would entail signing him for another year. I don't mean to be hurtful by I cannot understand you as you seem to be mixing up several different thoughts. Carry on. _
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 1:50:40 GMT -5
Trubisky has seven starts. He's not ready to start by Parcells Rules for Drafting 1st round QB.
Josh McCown will be (in 2017) the starter; and in (2018) will be 1A or better.
Josh McCown's contract will be extended if he can make it through the (2017) season.
McCown signed a one year contract but it is subject to change after the draft I WOULD IMAGINE IDONTKNOW
sue me
|
|
|
Post by willis on Apr 5, 2017 7:42:30 GMT -5
Trubisky has seven starts. He's not ready to start by Parcells Rules for Drafting 1st round QB. Josh McCown will be (in 2017) the starter; and in (2018) will be 1A or better. Josh McCown's contract will be extended if he can make it through the (2017) season. McCown signed a one year contract but it is subject to change after the draft I WOULD IMAGINE IDONTKNOW sue me probably right.
|
|
|
Post by crossfire on Apr 5, 2017 7:59:22 GMT -5
I want to see Hack or Petty play this year. I want to see what they have and if either one of them has the potential to be a starter. Hell... if they v backup. And if they suck, so be it. McCown is Fitz 2.0.
Fuck... Fitz 3.0... we already saw the shit-show that was Fitz 2.0.
Why the fuck bother starting McCown unless either the kids are not quite ready to play or they both get a shot and both suck so bad that they show nothing? If Petty isn't ready top play this year, he was a wasted pick.
Our chances of making the playoffs this year are zero. It is time to rebuild and McCown's part in a rebuild is there only as a mentor / spare part / last resort. I'd rather the team struggle as we see if either one of them is worth anything. If they suck ass, well, we will have a shitty season and have to draft a QB with a very high pick next year.
|
|
|
Post by MDL JET on Apr 5, 2017 9:07:49 GMT -5
I want to see Hack or Petty play this year. I want to see what they have and if either one of them has the potential to be a starter. Hell... if they v backup. And if they suck, so be it. McCown is Fitz 2.0. Fuck... Fitz 3.0... we already saw the shit-show that was Fitz 2.0. Why the fuck bother starting McCown unless either the kids are not quite ready to play or they both get a shot and both suck so bad that they show nothing? If Petty isn't ready top play this year, he was a wasted pick. Our chances of making the playoffs this year are zero. It is time to rebuild and McCown's part in a rebuild is there only as a mentor / spare part / last resort. I'd rather the team struggle as we see if either one of them is worth anything. If they suck ass, well, we will have a shitty season and have to draft a QB with a very high pick next year. Don't worry, it's Hack's job to lose. If anyone sees it as anything else, they're blind. They could still draft a QB, wherever it may be, but that just means Petty is gone. Nothing about Hack.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 10:30:10 GMT -5
I want to see Hack or Petty play this year. I want to see what they have and if either one of them has the potential to be a starter. Hell... if they v backup. And if they suck, so be it. McCown is Fitz 2.0. Fuck... Fitz 3.0... we already saw the shit-show that was Fitz 2.0. Why the fuck bother starting McCown unless either the kids are not quite ready to play or they both get a shot and both suck so bad that they show nothing? If Petty isn't ready top play this year, he was a wasted pick. Our chances of making the playoffs this year are zero. It is time to rebuild and McCown's part in a rebuild is there only as a mentor / spare part / last resort. I'd rather the team struggle as we see if either one of them is worth anything. If they suck ass, well, we will have a shitty season and have to draft a QB with a very high pick next year. The kids are NOT READY TO PLAY. Throw all the MSG you have at it; it's not gonna taste good. I loved the McCown pick because the season now has a chance. The guy knows enough about starting as a QB; reading defenses; getting players lined up. Bowles is trying to gear up; he knows what is on the table. No excuses. A fighting chance every week; since "?" is now further down the depth chart.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 10:33:38 GMT -5
I want to see Hack or Petty play this year. I want to see what they have and if either one of them has the potential to be a starter. Hell... if they v backup. And if they suck, so be it. McCown is Fitz 2.0. Fuck... Fitz 3.0... we already saw the shit-show that was Fitz 2.0. Why the fuck bother starting McCown unless either the kids are not quite ready to play or they both get a shot and both suck so bad that they show nothing? If Petty isn't ready top play this year, he was a wasted pick. Our chances of making the playoffs this year are zero. It is time to rebuild and McCown's part in a rebuild is there only as a mentor / spare part / last resort. I'd rather the team struggle as we see if either one of them is worth anything. If they suck ass, well, we will have a shitty season and have to draft a QB with a very high pick next year. Don't worry, it's Hack's job to lose. If anyone sees it as anything else, they're blind. They could still draft a QB, wherever it may be, but that just means Petty is gone. Nothing about Hack. You won't have to wait long. Hack is likely to see the field if he shows anything. McCown is very big and gets rocked outside the pocket trying to give his WR time. There will be a chance for the pupil if his summer is torrid.
|
|
|
Post by crossfire on Apr 5, 2017 11:17:04 GMT -5
I want to see Hack or Petty play this year. I want to see what they have and if either one of them has the potential to be a starter. Hell... if they v backup. And if they suck, so be it. McCown is Fitz 2.0. Fuck... Fitz 3.0... we already saw the shit-show that was Fitz 2.0. Why the fuck bother starting McCown unless either the kids are not quite ready to play or they both get a shot and both suck so bad that they show nothing? If Petty isn't ready top play this year, he was a wasted pick. Our chances of making the playoffs this year are zero. It is time to rebuild and McCown's part in a rebuild is there only as a mentor / spare part / last resort. I'd rather the team struggle as we see if either one of them is worth anything. If they suck ass, well, we will have a shitty season and have to draft a QB with a very high pick next year. The kids are NOT READY TO PLAY. Throw all the MSG you have at it; it's not gonna taste good. I loved the McCown pick because the season now has a chance. The guy knows enough about starting as a QB; reading defenses; getting players lined up. Bowles is trying to gear up; he knows what is on the table. No excuses. A fighting chance every week; since "?" is now further down the depth chart. Not trying to be a dick ( I don't have to try) but I don't get the season "has a chance" comment. A chance for what? Because short of one of the two young kids having a breakout year, I don't see us having a chance of anything other than a high draft pick next year.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Apr 5, 2017 11:24:01 GMT -5
The kids are NOT READY TO PLAY. Throw all the MSG you have at it; it's not gonna taste good. I loved the McCown pick because the season now has a chance. The guy knows enough about starting as a QB; reading defenses; getting players lined up. Bowles is trying to gear up; he knows what is on the table. No excuses. A fighting chance every week; since "?" is now further down the depth chart. Not trying to be a dick ( I don't have to try) but I don't get the season "has a chance" comment. A chance for what? Because short of one of the two young kids having a breakout year, I don't see us having a chance of anything other than a high draft pick next year. And that's a bingo. Feel free to take over for me here, can't understand it. _
|
|
|
Post by crossfire on Apr 5, 2017 11:35:38 GMT -5
I know McCown is known to be an intelligent guy with a good football mind. But he's not a good quarterback and never has been. The guy has thrown 79 touchdown passes in his career and 69 interceptions. His career win loss record is 18 and 42
Let me repeat that…
18 wins
42 losses
I just don't see what the purpose of starting him is unless you truly feel that neither Petty or Hack has the talent to make it.
I just don't want to roll through this year with McCown and going to next year having no idea once again whether our young quarterbacks have any talent.
Especially Petty. This is his third year in the league and if he's not ready to play I don't know what the hell he still on the roster for. Unless it's a camp body.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Apr 5, 2017 12:00:49 GMT -5
I know McCown is known to be an intelligent guy with a good football mind. But he's not a good quarterback and never has been. The guy has thrown 79 touchdown passes in his career and 69 interceptions. His career win loss record is 18 and 42 Let me repeat that… 18 wins 42 losses I just don't see what the purpose of starting him is unless you truly feel that neither Petty or Hack has the talent to make it. I just don't want to roll through this year with McCown and going to next year having no idea once again whether our young quarterbacks have any talent. Especially Petty. This is his third year in the league and if he's not ready to play I don't know what the hell he still on the roster for. Unless it's a camp body. Whether or not Petty or Hack have any talent or no talent between the two, you have to play them starting week 1. Starting McCown makes no rational sense. _
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Apr 5, 2017 12:05:04 GMT -5
I know McCown is known to be an intelligent guy with a good football mind. But he's not a good quarterback and never has been. The guy has thrown 79 touchdown passes in his career and 69 interceptions. His career win loss record is 18 and 42 Let me repeat that… 18 wins 42 losses I just don't see what the purpose of starting him is unless you truly feel that neither Petty or Hack has the talent to make it. I just don't want to roll through this year with McCown and going to next year having no idea once again whether our young quarterbacks have any talent. Especially Petty. This is his third year in the league and if he's not ready to play I don't know what the hell he still on the roster for. Unless it's a camp body. Whether or not Petty or Hack have any talent or no talent between the two, you have to play them starting week 1. Starting McCown makes no rational sense. _ go Jets!
|
|
|
Post by crusher on Apr 5, 2017 12:58:45 GMT -5
Whether or not Petty or Hack have any talent or no talent between the two, you have to play them starting week 1. Starting McCown makes no rational sense. _ go Jets! Peebag!! Whats up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 18:10:07 GMT -5
I know McCown is known to be an intelligent guy with a good football mind. But he's not a good quarterback and never has been. The guy has thrown 79 touchdown passes in his career and 69 interceptions. His career win loss record is 18 and 42 Let me repeat that… 18 wins 42 losses I just don't see what the purpose of starting him is unless you truly feel that neither Petty or Hack has the talent to make it. I just don't want to roll through this year with McCown and going to next year having no idea once again whether our young quarterbacks have any talent. Especially Petty. This is his third year in the league and if he's not ready to play I don't know what the hell he still on the roster for. Unless it's a camp body. Whether or not Petty or Hack have any talent or no talent between the two, you have to play them starting week 1. Starting McCown makes no rational sense. _ No; your pov makes no sense. Hack or Petty need to show that they have made a quantum leap forward in handling a team; setting up the offensive play and beating top defenses. Otherwise, Bowles, who needs this season, will choose to give lots of reps to the McCown, to avoid the disaster of last years bad start. We are going to go with a game manager; one that gives Bowles a broader play selection, experience, height, and grit. So, the fan will feel ripped off, because Bowles is going to give himself the best chance to win. Is that better? Maybe next time I will say PUT DOWN YOR POM POMS
|
|