|
Post by stlouiejetfan on Sept 1, 2016 21:09:44 GMT -5
Didnt get to see the game tonight. Honest hearfelt evaluations please.
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Sept 1, 2016 21:20:00 GMT -5
Didnt get to see the game tonight. Honest hearfelt evaluations please. I don't think you're ready for it. It's time to forget about the kid until next years OTA's.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Sept 1, 2016 21:23:54 GMT -5
Here you go: But really some of my notes before the draft and he showed it tonight: Decent mobility Good arm Bad deep ball accuracy Below avg intermediate accuracy (Against MSU he was 08 with 1 INT) Reads the defense well when he has time Poor at throwing on the run ( I watched his MSU, Maryland, and Illinous tape at least 6 times and saw him complete maybe 2 throws on the run) Doesn't fumble despite taking a lot of sacks (Which is nice since we've had Sanchez and Geno) Really good at throwing comebacks Pretty good at stepping up in the pocket to avoid the rush Bad at identifying blitzers When the pressure comes up the middle he's a deer in the headlights and makes bad decisions instead of taking the sack (We saw that tonight on his pick 6 and he did the exact same thing against MSU) His pathetic 56.1% completions was buoyed by a lot of screens to WRs and RBs
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Sept 1, 2016 21:27:53 GMT -5
He had more yards in INT's returned against him than he did passing yards on 30 attempts.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Sept 1, 2016 21:33:01 GMT -5
He had more yards in INT's returned against him than he did passing yards on 30 attempts. I kind of want to watch it again, but I think 5-6 of his 11 completions were screens. Half of which were tackled for a loss. Take those away and he was like 5-6 out of 24-25.
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Sept 1, 2016 21:37:46 GMT -5
He had more yards in INT's returned against him than he did passing yards on 30 attempts. I kind of want to watch it again, but I think 5-6 of his 11 completions were screens. Half of which were tackled for a loss. Take those away and he was like 5-6 out of 24-25. Not to pile on, but I guess I am going to pile on. After he was 4 for 6 on the opening drive against the Giants, he finished 2 of his last 10. So going back to last week, he was about 13 of his last 40 with 3 picks. Thats not good.
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Sept 1, 2016 21:37:58 GMT -5
He had more yards in INT's returned against him than he did passing yards on 30 attempts. I kind of want to watch it again, but I think 5-6 of his 11 completions were screens. Half of which were tackled for a loss. Take those away and he was like 5-6 out of 24-25. I'll re-watch it tomorrow because I was watching an internet feed tonight. At this point I'm done about commenting on Hack until next season. If they IR Petty he will get some practice reps, so hopefully he looks competent next year.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Sept 1, 2016 21:46:47 GMT -5
Not to pile on, but I guess I am going to pile on. After he was 4 for 6 on the opening drive against the Giants, he finished 2 of his last 10. So going back to last week, he was about 13 of his last 40 with 3 picks. Thats not good. He had two of his best throws I've ever seen against the Giants. I was like WTF. Maybe there is a tiny bit of hope, but I doubt it. A lot of the time he's not even close when he misses. It's either way short or way over their head.
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Sept 1, 2016 21:48:41 GMT -5
Not to pile on, but I guess I am going to pile on. After he was 4 for 6 on the opening drive against the Giants, he finished 2 of his last 10. So going back to last week, he was about 13 of his last 40 with 3 picks. Thats not good. He had two of his best throws I've ever seen against the Giants. I was like WTF. Maybe there is a tiny bit of hope, but I doubt it. A lot of the time he's not even close when he misses. It's either way short or way over their head. That what has been so frustrating about Hack going back to his PSU days. You know he is capable of making some great throws, but he is also capable of making craptastic mistakes. Time for him to sit. learn and we will see how much progress he makes next year. Didn't expect anything out of him this season anyway.
|
|
|
Post by shakin on Sept 1, 2016 21:50:47 GMT -5
he reminded me of a poor man's tim tebow. a really poor man's.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Sept 1, 2016 21:52:44 GMT -5
He had two of his best throws I've ever seen against the Giants. I was like WTF. Maybe there is a tiny bit of hope, but I doubt it. A lot of the time he's not even close when he misses. It's either way short or way over their head. That what has been so frustrating about Hack going back to his PSU days. You know he is capable of making some great throws, but he is also capable of making craptastic mistakes. Time for him to sit. learn and we will see how much progress he makes next year. Didn't expect anything out of him this season anyway. Agreed. He shouldn't see the field until 2018. That's why I hated the pick. I like Mac and Bowles, but why did they have to hitch their future to Hack and Fitz. I doubt our 2017 starting QB is on our roster right now, and you don't get a long leash in the NFL.
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Sept 1, 2016 21:57:04 GMT -5
Looked green as hell from what I saw, as I expected he would all pre-season if he was going to see any action at all. He had that one really promising drive against the Giants and then it's basically been downhill.
Hack was a 2 year project from the get-go. And really, barring the occasional exception, so are the majority of QB's taken after the 1st round.
I sure as shit wouldn't put all of my eggs in the Hackenberg basket moving forward, but is there really any question as to whether he has the highest upside of any QB on the roster at the moment?
Next years QB crop in the draft looks like shit outside of maybe Watson, who is a phenomenal college QB, but I'm not even completely sold on at the pro level. Who else? Kaaya? Mayfield? Kelly?
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Sept 1, 2016 21:59:36 GMT -5
Looked green as hell from what I saw, as I expected he would all pre-season if he was going to see any action at all. Hack was a 2 year project from the get-go. And really, barring the occasional exception, so are the majority of QB's taken after the 1st round. I sure as shit wouldn't put all of my eggs in the Hackenberg basket moving forward, but is there really any question as to whether he has the highest upside of any QB on the roster at the moment?Next years QB looks like shit outside of maybe Watson, who is a phenomenal college QB, but I'm not even completely sold on at the pro level. Who else? Kaaya? Mayfield? Kelly? That's not saying much.
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Sept 1, 2016 22:05:37 GMT -5
Looked green as hell from what I saw, as I expected he would all pre-season if he was going to see any action at all. Hack was a 2 year project from the get-go. And really, barring the occasional exception, so are the majority of QB's taken after the 1st round. I sure as shit wouldn't put all of my eggs in the Hackenberg basket moving forward, but is there really any question as to whether he has the highest upside of any QB on the roster at the moment?Next years QB looks like shit outside of maybe Watson, who is a phenomenal college QB, but I'm not even completely sold on at the pro level. Who else? Kaaya? Mayfield? Kelly? That's not saying much. He was a total boom or bust prospect from the start. If you take your time with him and clean up his footwork, maybe you have something. This is a kid who is 3 years removed from being the top HS recruit in the nation and is 2 years removed from being hailed as the next college phenom before O'Brien upgraded to the pros and Penn State replaced him with a fuckhead like Franklin who was hellbent on some gimmicky spread BS. You can sit Hack on the bench until 2018 and he'd still only be 23 years old. With his kind of upside, leadership qualities, and raw physical skill...he's worth keeping around for another season or two and then gauging what you have.
|
|
|
Post by ruby2 on Sept 1, 2016 22:09:17 GMT -5
I didn't see it at the college level, but I guess give him at least another season before sealing the deal on him.
If he was a 4th round pick, it would make a lot more sense. That being said, just because he was taken 2 rounds earlier than he probably shoul have been isn't real reason for everyone to jump off a roof. Yeah, they reached, but they did so at the most important position in sports, in a prospect that indeed at one point, did show tremendous promise. Most of our 2nd rounders bust anyway, whatever, it was worth a shot, and still could prove good in a year or so.
|
|