|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 14:40:31 GMT -5
Your late in the game buddy lol Yeah, I was reading the thread.. Instant real time kick in the nuts. Agreed but he is going to find out how shitty his life will be here in DC with egomaniac Snyder.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 14:37:30 GMT -5
Your late in the game buddy lol
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 14:36:36 GMT -5
Why does it seem we miss on everyone with any credibility? does every job we offer have to go to guys who have never done the job before. This will incite another awful negative Jets piece by ManASS
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 14:27:40 GMT -5
@albertbreer 2m2 minutes ago Scot McCloughan has accepted a job as Redskins GM, they're negotiating the contract now. That's a very good hire for Washington. You had to figure if he was going to take a job it would be as GM. It might be but with Snyder around he will be gone in 2 years. Might take up heroin as a hobby. So whats up with Bruce Allen?
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 14:26:42 GMT -5
@albertbreer 1m1 minute ago McCloughan had discussions with the Redskins, Raiders and Jets. In the end, the Skins job fit him best. This guy must still be drinking his ass off. Have fun in Washington with Snyder meddling in every affair. Yeah I am starting to think that the skins are the only team that offered him the GM job. I live in Arlington and fans are like who the fuck is that??
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 14:22:25 GMT -5
@mikejoneswapo 4m4 minutes ago Source says Redskins and McCloughan do not have a deal and the team has not offered him the job. Must be Manish!
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 13:51:56 GMT -5
Would love Kirchner as GM with McCloughlan as the Senior Personnel Executive, the same role he had in Seattle. He and Kirchner have already worked together. The fact that they are talking to Mcloughlin for a role other than the GM tells me that they have decided on their GM and I think it is Kirchner. Then I think Dan Quinn will be announced on Thursday and Trestman will be the OC. I think this is how it will go down.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 13:46:56 GMT -5
Good point about Quinn as it is concerning, hopefully Bowles does well today. I remember when Bowles was the interim HC of the Dolphins the players responded well to him and he seemed to breathe some life into the team as there was an improvement on offense, defense, and special teams. Granted it was for only 3 games but the diffrence in the team was definitely noticeable. The players and local media homers were all for him getting the HC job. I thought Bowles was coming in tomorrow?
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 13:45:50 GMT -5
I think they should give Marc Trestman in here as the offensive coordinator. He can make are an offense explosive and has the penchant to develop QB's. He will probably be in high demand so the Jets would have to move quickly. Tampa Bay is pretty high on him because they tried to develop an offense there that is similar to the Bears offense. Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 12:26:39 GMT -5
You make a great case. Kubiak's abilities as an offensive coordinator are very good. The running game was amazing with Foster and Tate in Houston and with Baltimore he developed a gameplan for Justin Forsett (who is nothing more than a scat back) to succeed as a lead back. My problem is on the defensive side of the ball and his questionable leadership abilities to motivate his team to win the big game. Houston had a pretty talented team under him...a top 5 defense, a great offense with multiple weapons...etc..yet they couldn't win the big game when it counted. He will also need a top notch defensive coordinator to come along with him, someone like Wade Phillips or Jim Shwartz. He would not be a bad choice but I would much rather go with Quinn, Bowles or Morrone. I don't know if you can say that. Maybe it was his leadership abilities, schemes and motivational skills that took below average talent on a team that had never won many games prior to his arrival and made them a playoff team several times with Matt Schaub at QB, buitl a pretty studly defense and even won a playoff game with Case Keenum... that's not bad. And who were the great players he had? It also was his first coaching experience and I'm sure he learned. As an example, Cleveland was BB's first coaching experience, didn't do so well, and then flourished when he got to NE. I don't know if he's the best guy or not, but I wouldn't jump to those conclusions so quick. Andre Johnson, Arian Foster, Owen Daniels....a great offensive line...and a plethora of defensive studs JJ Watt, Brian Cushing, Pollard, Ryans, Quin, etc...There is no question that Kubiak did wonders with the offense.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 11:47:59 GMT -5
I like Kubiak because: 1. He addresses the change we need to hire someone who is from the other side of the ball
2. He is a good coach, that bum Matt Shaub QB'ing is a MAJOR reason his team went south. If you look at the teams in the playoffs the one consistent thing is the QB's. That being said us not having one of the upper echelon QB's means we need a certain level of expertise on that side of the ball. Kubiak also maintained a good defense during his time from the texans. 3. He has 3 superbowl rings and has been to the big show 6 times!! 4. If you look at the improvement that Flacco and the offense had made this year you have to admit that he has had positive influence since joining them. 5. He is the only candidate that has head coaching experience not named Marrone. I am not against hiring Kubiak if he turns out to be the best candidate. I am against not hiring the best candidate if he happens to be on the defensive side of the ball. While an offensive coach would be nice, we are doing ourselves a disservice if we limit the choice to an offensive coach. Totally agree and lets not forget that the head coach needs to be a part of all facets of the game including the defense and special teams. Just because you hire an offensive coach doesn't mean your offense will be good.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 11:36:24 GMT -5
Originally, Quinn was my first choice but after listening to a few other posters and doing a little research my opinion has changed. I do believe he has a chance to be a good HC in the league but at this juncture with the Jets, I want to play the odds. I'd rather Kubiak than Quinn and here's why: 1. The defense was number 1 in the 2 years that he led it but wasnt it also number 1 the year before Quinn got there? 2. He has a LOT of talent on his side of the ball so is it the coaching or the talent that someone else can make look just as good? I like Kubiak because: 1. He addresses the change we need to hire someone who is from the other side of the ball 2. He is a good coach, that bum Matt Shaub QB'ing is a MAJOR reason his team went south. If you look at the teams in the playoffs the one consistent thing is the QB's. That being said us not having one of the upper echelon QB's means we need a certain level of expertise on that side of the ball. Kubiak also maintained a good defense during his time from the texans. 3. He has 3 superbowl rings and has been to the big show 6 times!! 4. If you look at the improvement that Flacco and the offense had made this year you have to admit that he has had positive influence since joining them. 5. He is the only candidate that has head coaching experience not named Marrone. Who else has this resume? Discuss You make a great case. Kubiak's abilities as an offensive coordinator are very good. The running game was amazing with Foster and Tate in Houston and with Baltimore he developed a gameplan for Justin Forsett (who is nothing more than a scat back) to succeed as a lead back. My problem is on the defensive side of the ball and his questionable leadership abilities to motivate his team to win the big game. Houston had a pretty talented team under him...a top 5 defense, a great offense with multiple weapons...etc..yet they couldn't win the big game when it counted. He will also need a top notch defensive coordinator to come along with him, someone like Wade Phillips or Jim Shwartz. He would not be a bad choice but I would much rather go with Quinn, Bowles or Morrone.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 6, 2015 11:01:08 GMT -5
Puff puff give baby!
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 5, 2015 22:09:13 GMT -5
Guess it's a moot point now. It looks like Quinn is the favorite according to Mort and Lacanfora. I wonder if some individuals will migrate to total quinn support now Quinn was the guy I actually picked in the poll.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jan 5, 2015 21:52:50 GMT -5
Not really...the Dolphins were much better in week 2 then week 17 where they simply gave up...but you can stick with your opinion on Maronne it's all good...I'll just take it from the established players (Mawae, Woody) , respected football people and non Manish writers who have nothing but good things to say about him. Perhaps he's a fantastic man, but his work in Buffalo isn't quite Bill Walshian. Guess it's a moot point now. It looks like Quinn is the favorite according to Mort and Lacanfora.
|
|